Slack Adoption Act 1968

Reprint as at 26 November 1968

Slack Adoption Act 1968

Private Act1968 No 6
Date of assent25 November 1968
Commencement25 November 1968

Note

Changes authorised by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 have been made in this reprint.

A general outline of these changes is set out in the notes at the end of this reprint, together with other explanatory material about this reprint.


An Act to give to an interim order of adoption made on 4 November 1965 in favour of Terence Richard Slack and Margaret Ann Slack as adopting parents of Michael William Slack force and effect as if it had been a final order of adoption made on the same day

  • Preamble

    Whereas Michael William Slack (hereinafter called the child) was born on 8 August 1965 and was the subject of an application for adoption made to the Magistrate's Court at Kaikohe by Terence Richard Slack late of Waiwatenui, farmer, deceased (hereinafter called the father) and Margaret Ann Slack, his wife (hereinafter called the mother) upon which an interim order was made in favour of the father and the mother on 4 November 1965:

    And whereas the father died on 19 March 1966, leaving the residue of his estate to be divided equally between his children living at his death and in circumstances that gave his dependants the right to compensation under the Workers' Compensation Act 1956:

    And whereas the father had no natural children but prior to his death he and the mother had duly adopted Philip George Slack born on 28 August 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the brother):

    And whereas no application for a final order of adoption of the child had (or could have) been made prior to the death of the father but such application was made by the mother on 24 May 1966 and on the same day such final order was made and (after full disclosure of the facts) expressed by the court to be in favour of the father and the mother:

    And whereas the mother, the brother, and the child were all totally dependent on the father at the time of his death:

    And whereas it is accepted by all interested parties that it would have been the wish of the father that the brother and the child should share equally in his estate and in any benefit arising upon his death:

    And whereas notwithstanding the terms in which the final order of adoption is expressed it did not create or cause to exist between the father and child the full legal consequence of such a relationship at the date of the father's death and as a result the child is not entitled to be treated as a dependant or a relative within the meaning of the Workers' Compensation Act 1956 (and therefore not entitled to any moneys payable under the claim arising under that Act) or to be treated as a child of the father (and therefore entitled to a share in his estate):

    And whereas it is the desire of all interested parties that the wishes of the father (hereinbefore referred to) be carried out by securing equality of treatment in all respects between the child and the brother:

    And whereas it appears that this can be effected only by enacting that the interim order of adoption in respect of the child shall be deemed for all purposes to be and always to have been a final order.