(1) Where a trustee corporation—
(b) Is deemed by subsection (3) or subsection (4) of section 117 of this Act to be a manager appointed under this Act in respect of the property of any person (being property the gross value of which, as at the commencement of this Act, did not exceed $100,000),—
the trustee corporation shall, in accordance with subsection (1A) of this section, file in the Court the reports specified in subsection (1B) of this section.
(1A) The reports required by subsection (1) of this section shall,—
(1B) The reports required under subsection (1) of this section comprise—
(a) a report from each of 2 medical practitioners (at least 1 of whom must be independent of the applicant, or any relative of the applicant) as to the extent to which the person subject to the order has the competence or lacks the competence to manage his or her own affairs in relation to his or her property; and
(1C) If, after consideration of the reports filed in accordance with subsection (1) of this section, the Court is of the opinion—
the Court may order that the order be discharged or that the order be extended with such variation, if any, as the Court may direct.
(1D) Notwithstanding subsections (1) to (1C) of this section, where the reports are filed under subsection (1)(a) of this section, the Court may if it thinks fit, either on its own motion or on the application of a person specified in subsection (2) of this section, direct that a full review of the case be undertaken and subsections (3) to (10) of this section shall apply with any necessary modification to every such review as if the original application filed in the Court were an order made by the Court.
(1E) Notwithstanding subsections (1) to (1C) of this section, where the reports are filed under subsection (1)(b) of this section, the Court may if it thinks fit, either on its own motion or on the application of a person specified in subsection (2) of this section, direct that a full review of the case be undertaken and subsections (3) to (10) of this section shall apply.
(1F) In any case other than a case in which reports have been filed under subsection (1) of this section in relation to a person subject to a property order, any person who, under a property order, is the manager of any property and who is of the opinion that the property order should be discharged may file in the Court—
(1G) If, after consideration of the reports filed in accordance with subsection (1F) of this section, the Court is of the opinion—
the Court may order that the order be discharged.
(1H) Notwithstanding subsections (1F) and (1G) of this section, where an application is made under subsection (1F) of this section, the Court may if it thinks fit, either on its own motion or on the application of a person specified in subsection (2) of this section, direct that a full review of the case be undertaken and subsections (3) to (10) of this section shall apply.
(2) Without limiting anything in section 31(8) of this Act or in subsections (1) to (1H) of this section, the following persons may at any time apply to a Court for a review of any property order, whether made by consent or otherwise:
(3) Without limiting the discretion of the Court on any application under subsection (2) of this section, but subject to subsection (4) of this section, on an application made pursuant to section 31(8) of this Act or where the Court directs under subsection (1D) or subsection (1E) or subsection (1H) of this section that a full review of a case be undertaken, the Court shall review the competence of the person subject to the property order to manage his or her own affairs in relation to his or her property.
(4) Notwithstanding anything in subsection (3) of this section, where an application for review is made to provide for a new manager to be appointed in place of the present manager, the Court shall not be obliged to review (but may review) the matters specified in that subsection.
(5) On any application for the review of a property order, the primary objectives of the Court shall be those set out in section 28 of this Act.
(6) Subject to subsection (7) of this section, on any application for review of a property order, a Court may—
(7) On any application to which subsection (3) of this section applies, the Court shall not make any order that would extend the original order beyond the date on which it would otherwise expire unless the Court is satisfied, having regard to the relevant provisions of Part 3 of this Act, that the order continues to be necessary in the interests of the person in respect of whom it was made.
(8) If the Court does make an order that extends the effect of the original order beyond the date on which it would otherwise have expired, the Court shall specify a date, being not later than 3 years after the date of the new order, by which the manager is to apply to the Court for a further review of the original order.
(9) Notwithstanding anything in subsection (8) of this section, the Court may specify a date, for a further review of the original order, later than 3 years but not later than 5 years after the date of the new order if it is satisfied, in the exceptional circumstances of the case, that an earlier review is not necessary in the interests of the person to whom the order relates.
(10) No order to which subsection (8) or subsection (9) of this section applies shall automatically expire by reason only of the fact that the date specified for the first review or any further review has been reached.
Subsection (1) was substituted, and subsections (1A) and (1B) were inserted, as from 1 July 1994, by section 9(1) Protection of Personal and Property Rights Amendment Act 1994 (1994 No 54).
Subsection (1B)(a) was substituted, as from 1 July 1996, by section 143(1) Medical Practitioners Act 1995 (1995 No 95). See clause 2 Medical Practitioners Act Commencement Order 1996 (SR 1996/162).
Subsection (1B)(a) was substituted, as from 18 September 2004, by section 175(1) Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 (2003 No 48). See sections 178 to 227 of that Act as to the transitional provisions.
Subsections (1C) to (1F) were inserted, as from 1 July 1994, by section 9(1) Protection of Personal and Property Rights Amendment Act 1994 (1994 No 54).
Subsection (1F)(a) was substituted, as from 1 July 1996, by section 143(1) Medical Practitioners Act 1995 (1995 No 95). See clause 2 Medical Practitioners Act Commencement Order 1996 (SR 1996/162).
Subsection (1F)(a) was substituted, as from 18 September 2004, by section 175(1) Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 (2003 No 48). See sections 178 to 227 of that Act as to the transitional provisions.
Subsections (1G) and (1H) were inserted, as from 1 July 1994, by section 9(1) Protection of Personal and Property Rights Amendment Act 1994 (1994 No 54).
Subsection (2) was amended, as from 1 July 1994, by section 9(2) Protection of Personal Property Rights Amendment Act 1994 (1994 No 54) by substituting the expression “subsections (1) to (1H)”
for the expression “subsection (1)”
.
Subsection (3) was amended, as from 1 July 1994, by section 9(3) Protection of Personal Property Rights Amendment Act 1994 (1994 No 54) by substituting the words “where the Court directs under subsection (1D) or subsection (1E) or subsection (1H) of this section that a full review of a case be undertaken,”
for the words “subsection (1) of this section,”
.
Subsection (10) was inserted, as from 1 July 1994, by section 9(4) Protection of Personal Property Rights Amendment Act 1994 (1994 No 54).