(1) In the case of a literary, dramatic, or musical work, the right conferred by section 98(2) is infringed by a person who—
a derogatory treatment of the work.
(2) In the case of an artistic work, the right conferred by section 98(2) is infringed by a person who—
(3) Subsection (2) does not apply to a work of architecture in the form of a building; but where the author of such a work is identified on the building and it is the subject of derogatory treatment the author has the right to require the identification to be removed.
(4) In the case of a film, the right conferred by section 98(2) is infringed by a person who—
(5) The right conferred by section 98(2) extends to the treatment of parts of a work resulting from a previous treatment by a person other than the author or director of the work, if those parts are attributed to, or are likely to be regarded as the work of, the author or director.
(6) The right conferred by section 98(2) is infringed by a person who, in the course of a business,—
an object that is, and that the person knows or has reason to believe is, a work or a copy of a work that—
(7) The right conferred by section 98(2) is infringed by a person who does an act described in subsection (1) or subsection (2) or subsection (4) or subsection (6) or who authorises another person to do such an act.
Compare: Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 ss 80(3)–(7), 83 (UK)
Section 99(1)(a): amended, on 31 October 2008, by section 58(1) of the Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment Act 2008 (2008 No 27).
Section 99(2)(a): amended, on 31 October 2008, by section 58(2) of the Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment Act 2008 (2008 No 27).
Section 99(4)(a): substituted, on 31 October 2008, by section 58(3) of the Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment Act 2008 (2008 No 27).
Section 99(4)(c)(i): substituted, on 31 October 2008, by section 58(4) of the Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment Act 2008 (2008 No 27).