Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 No 1 (as at 01 July 2011), Public Act

227 Functions of Disciplinary Tribunal
  • The functions of the Disciplinary Tribunal are—

    • (a) to hear and determine any application made by a Standards Committee or the Legal Complaints Review Officer for the suspension of a practitioner pending the determination of a charge that the Standards Committee or the Legal Complaints Review Officer has laid against that practitioner:

    • (b) to hear and determine any charge against a practitioner or former practitioner or an incorporated firm or former incorporated firm or an employee or former employee of a practitioner or an incorporated firm that is made to it by a Standards Committee or the Legal Complaints Review Officer:

    • (c) to hear and determine any application made by a person under section 246 for the restoration of his or her name to the roll or to the register of conveyancers:

    • (e) to hear and determine any appeal under section 42:

    • (f) to hear and determine any application made by a practitioner or an incorporated firm under section 248 for the consent of the Disciplinary Tribunal to the employment by the practitioner or incorporated firm of a person who—

      • (i) is under suspension from practice as a barrister or as a barrister and solicitor or as a conveyancing practitioner; or

      • (ii) has had his or her name struck off the roll otherwise than at his or her own request; or

      • (iii) has had his or her registration as a conveyancing practitioner cancelled by an order made under this Act; or

      • (iv) is disqualified, by an order made under section 242(1)(h), from employment in connection with a practitioner's or incorporated firm's practice:

    • (g) to make rules, not inconsistent with this Act, in respect of the making, hearing, and determination of applications, inquiries, appeals, and other proceedings before the Disciplinary Tribunal:

    • (h) to perform such other functions as are conferred on it by this Act or any other enactment.

    Compare: 1982 No 123 ss 110, 130