The Transport and Industrial Relations Committee has examined the Employment Relations (Breaks and Infant Feeding) Amendment Bill and recommends that it be passed with the amendments shown.
The purpose of this bill is to amend the Employment Relations Act 2000 to require employers to provide employees with meal and rest breaks, and with appropriate facilities and breaks for those who wish to breastfeed (or to express breast milk).
The bill supports Government policy by protecting and promoting breastfeeding. The provisions regarding breastfeeding will also be supported by a code of employment practice.
While new section 69Y requires the employer to provide facilities and breaks for employees who wish to breastfeed “so far as it is reasonable and practicable in the circumstances”, clause 4 omits these words. Some submitters believed that this creates an inconsistency.
We therefore recommend that the words “so far as is reasonable and practicable in the circumstances” be added to clause 4(a) so as to make it consistent with new section 69Y.
New section 69ZD(2), when read with new section 69ZD(5) and the definition of “work period” in section 69ZD, would entitle employees to a third 10-minute rest break in each working day if their work period (which includes breaks) were just over eight hours long. This is because no period of work is specified after which the entitlement would begin to apply. We therefore recommend that section 69ZD(2) be amended so that employees would become entitled to a 10-minute rest break after having worked for two hours or more, but not more than four hours. When read with section 69ZD(5), this would also mean that an employee would become entitled to a third 10-minute rest break if his or her work period were 10 hours or more.
Many submitters were concerned that the bill is too prescriptive about when rest and meal breaks are to be taken.
The intention of section 69ZE(5) is to provide employers and employees with the flexibility to agree when rest and meal breaks are to be taken during the work period. Only in the absence of an agreement by both parties does the bill prescribe the timing of those breaks in sections 69ZE (1) to (4).
Many submitters were concerned, however, that section 69ZE(5) does not make it clear that the timing of rest and meal breaks may be agreed between employers and employees.
We recommend that section 69ZE(5) be deleted and new section 69ZE(1AA) inserted, to make it clear that rest and meal breaks are to be observed at times agreed between employers and employees or as specified by sections 69ZE(1) to (4) if no such agreement exists.
We recommend that the bill be amended to clarify that section 69ZG, which provides that an employment agreement may not exclude, restrict, or reduce an employee’s statutory break entitlements, does not override the provisions of section 69ZE, which allows an employer and employee to agree about when during the work period the break entitlements are taken.
The Employment Relations (Breaks and Infant Feeding) Amendment Bill was referred to the committee on 9 April 2008. The closing date for submissions was 19 May 2008. We received and considered 46 submissions from interested groups and individuals. We heard 22 submissions, which included holding hearings in Auckland.
We received advice from the Department of Labour.
Hon Mark Gosche (Chairperson)
Hon Maurice Williamson (Deputy Chairperson)
David Bennett
Peter Brown
Russell Fairbrother
Darien Fenton
Lesley Soper
Hon Judith Tizard
Kate Wilkinson
Pansy Wong
Sue Moroney replaced Hon Judith Tizard for this item of business.