General policy statement
Purpose
The purpose of this Bill is to empower Government-appointed commissioners to provide the governance and leadership necessary to rapidly address long standing, systemic, institutional and governance issues with the Canterbury Regional Council (ECan). The Bill will provide the commissioners with the necessary powers to enable them to progress as rapidly as possible the development of the Canterbury region’s resource management framework.
This Bill will facilitate the timely development of a robust, clear, and effective framework for the management of natural resources—particularly fresh water—in Canterbury. The Bill will also ensure that the implementation and future development of this framework is supported by a well functioning regional council with appropriate systems, structures, and capacity.
Provisions relating to replacement of the governing body of ECan
The Bill will provide for the replacement of ECan’s elected council with appointed commissioners who will become the governing body of ECan until the long-standing systemic, institutional, and governance issues are satisfactorily addressed, or until new elected councillors take office following local body elections scheduled for late 2013, whichever is the earlier.
The commissioners will not be able to address these issues before the next triennial election, which is scheduled to be held in October 2010. The Bill will, therefore, defer that election for the Canterbury region.
The commissioners will be expected to provide leadership and direction for institutional change, and leadership to the Canterbury region on resource management matters, specifically those relating to fresh water management.
As the governing body of ECan, the commissioners will have the same statutory duties and powers as the former elected members under the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA), Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA), and other statutes that give regional councils responsibilities. The public consultation and participation requirements of the LGA and RMA will remain in place.
Provisions relating to the additional functions and powers of commissioners
The Bill makes provision for 3 particular aspects of the RMA regime within the jurisdiction of regional councils that are applicable to fresh water management:
it gives ECan the power to impose moratoria in respect of applications for certain water and discharge permits:
it sets up a new regime for dealing with applications for water conservation orders in the Canterbury region:
alters certain aspects of the process for approving regional policy statements or plans.
Moratoria in relation to certain water and discharge permits
The Bill will provide commissioners with the power to impose targeted moratoria, subject to the approval of the Minister for the Environment, to prevent the granting of further resource consents for water takes in groundwater zones and other fresh water resources in Canterbury that are nearing or beyond full allocation. These moratoria will enable commissioners to refuse to accept new applications and to put existing applications on hold in defined areas for a defined time period. These moratoria will not affect applications that have either been decided or are subject to appeals to the Environment Court. Those applications would proceed in accordance with existing statutory processes and criteria. The Bill provides both the commissioners and the Minister for the Environment with the power to revoke a moratorium at any time.
At the end of any moratorium, the Bill requires applications to be processed by reference to any new planning framework that has been put in place. Applicants whose applications were put on hold will be given a period of 6 months after the end of a moratorium to revise their applications in light of the new planning framework without prejudice to their position in the processing queue, with the proviso that the revised application must be similar in scope to the original application. Resource consents that are due to expire during the period in which the Bill is in place will be deemed to continue for a period of 6 months after the end of the moratorium. That additional period of time gives applicants an opportunity to apply for replacement consents against any new planning framework that has been put in place.
Water conservation orders
The Bill requires the Minister for the Environment to direct applications for new water conservation orders (WCOs) in Canterbury, and applications to vary or revoke existing water conservation orders in Canterbury, to the commissioners rather than to a special tribunal. The commissioners will follow normal statutory procedures for inviting submissions and conducting hearings, although there will be no provision for submissions (appeals) to the Environment Court on the merit of their recommendations. In addition, the commissioners’ recommendations on water conservation orders will be made against an amended decision-making framework that—
provides for sustainable management as the primary consideration in determining whether to recommend that an order be made; and
ensures that appropriate regard is given to the most recently expressed aspirations of the local community, as reflected in the vision and principles of the Canterbury Water Management Strategy (CWMS).
The commissioners' recommendations on water conservation orders will be appealable to the High Court on points of law only. The Minister for the Environment will have the final decision-making role on WCOs in accordance with existing RMA provisions.
In the particular case of the application for a WCO over the Hurunui River, the Bill will promote consistent planning outcomes and avoid the potential need for subsequent revision of the Environment Court’s recommendations (and the time, cost, and uncertainty associated with this) by referring the application to the commissioners. The Environment Court process will cease and the commissioners will consider the application, and submissions on it, against the same amended criteria against which applications for new WCOs are to be considered. The original applicant will have an opportunity to revise the application in light of the new decision-making criteria. In order to ensure that the process is equitable, the Bill will allow persons who made submissions to the special tribunal on the original application for a WCO over the Hurunui River (including the parties to the current Environment Court proceedings) to make submissions to the commissioners and to participate in hearings.
Canterbury resource management policy and planning framework
In order to enable the commissioners to address resource management issues in the Canterbury region as rapidly as possible, there will be no provision for appeals on the merit to the Environment Court against the commissioners’ decisions on the Canterbury resource management planning and policy framework. However, the Bill does confer a right for specified persons to appeal the commissioners’ decisions to the High Court on points of law. Appeals to the superior courts on the decisions of the High Court will follow normal statutory processes. Any plan variations or plan changes subsequently proposed by the commissioners will be subject to the same revised appeal process (no appeals to the Environment Court on points of merit).
When making decisions on regional plans and policy statements in Canterbury, including any variations or changes subsequently promoted by the commissioners, the commissioners will be required to have particular regard to the most recently expressed aspirations of the regional community on fresh water management, as reflected in the vision and principles of the CWMS.
Clause by clause analysis
Clause 1 is the Title clause.
Clause 2 is the commencement clause and provides that the Bill comes into force on the day after the date on which it receives Royal assent.
Part 1
Preliminary provisions
Clause 3 sets out the purpose of the Bill.
Clause 4 is the general interpretation provision (there is another, in Part 3, for that Part only). Two terms defined in clause 4 are critical to understanding the timeframe of the Bill: replacement day and resumption day. The replacement day is the day on which the commissioners appointed under the Bill assume responsibility for the governance of ECan. The resumption day is the day on which the members elected at the next election (itself a defined term) resume governance of ECan. Because the Bill in clause 22 defers the local body elections that would otherwise be held in October 2010 in respect of ECan, next election means the next election after the deferred election (which in default of an election called before October 2013 will be the 2013 election).
Clause 5 provides that the Bill binds the Crown.
Clause 6 provides for the staggered expiry and repeal of various provisions of the Bill, and finally, by Order in Council, the repeal of the balance of the Bill.
Part 2
Replacement of governing body of ECan
Clause 7 sets out what Part 2 of the Bill does. Broadly, Part 2 deals with the technicalities of appointing commissioners to undertake the governance of ECan for a limited period in place of the elected members.
Termination of office of elected members
Clause 8 provides for the replacement day, the day on which the commissioners assume office. The responsible Ministers must determine the replacement day.
Clause 9 removes the elected members of ECan holding office immediately before the replacement day. They cease to hold office at the close of the day before the replacement day, so that there is no overlap with the commissioners.
Appointment of commissioners
Clauses 10 to 19 focus on the details of the appointment of commissioners. They include the steps that must be taken to appoint the commissioners (clause 12), the requirement that the commissioners must have collective knowledge and expertise in certain matters (clause 14), their term of office (clause 17), and their remuneration (clause 18).
Functions of commissioners
Clause 20 constitutes the commissioners as the governing body of ECan for the term of their office with the functions, responsibilities, duties, and powers set out in that clause.
Clause 21 requires the commissioners to establish a process for seeking advice from the mayors of the territorial authorities in the Canterbury region.
2010 election for members of ECan
Clause 22 defers the October 2010 election that would otherwise be held in respect of ECan.
Next election
Clause 23 provides that the members elected at the next election come into office on the resumption day.
Application of other enactments
Clauses 24 to 26 are technical provisions ensuring that the provisions of Part 2 of this Bill dovetail with the LGA and the Local Electoral Act 2001.
Saving and transitional provisions
Clauses 27 and 28 are saving and transitional provisions.
Part 3
Additional functions and powers of ECan after commencement day
Subpart 1—Preliminary matters
Clause 29 sets out what each of the 4 subparts of Part 3 does. Broadly, Part 3 provides new functions and powers for ECan in addition to certain of its existing functions as they relate to fresh water management.
Clause 30 provides that Part 2 of the RMA applies to the exercise by ECan of its functions and powers under this Bill.
Clause 31 confers a power for certain transitional regulations to be made.
Subpart 2—Moratoria on specified applications
Imposition of moratorium
Clause 32 provides that this subpart applies in addition to the RMA.
Clause 33 defines the terms specified application, permit, and relevant regional plan for this subpart.
Clause 34 provides a power for ECan to impose moratoria over certain kinds of applications for water and discharge permits in relation to any area of the Canterbury region. The matters relevant to making decisions in relation to the use of this power include the vision and principles of the CWMS.
Clauses 35 and 36 relate to the notification of a moratorium and the power to end a moratorium. Before a moratorium is brought to an end, ECan (or the Minister, if directing that a moratorium be brought to an end) must have regard to the adequacy of the applicable regional plan or proposed plan relating to the management of fresh water.
Effect of moratorium
Clauses 37 to 40 spell out the effect of a moratorium on applications for permits, depending on whether an application is made before a moratorium comes into force, during the currency of a moratorium, or after the end of a moratorium. In general, the existence of a moratorium means that consideration of an application is deferred until 6 months after the end of the moratorium, unless a hearing has commenced or there is to be no hearing of an application. In a case where a request has been made under section 87D of the RMA for the Environment Court, rather than ECan, to determine an application, and that request is granted before a moratorium is in force, the moratorium is of no effect.
Treatment of specified applications at end of moratorium
Clauses 41 to 43 set out the process for the consideration of applications at the end of a moratorium. Applicants must be given the opportunity to revise and lodge their applications again, enabling them to take into account any changes to the applicable regional plan or proposed plan. Whether or not applications have been revised, they must be considered by ECan at the end of the period of 6 months from the end of a moratorium, under the relevant region plan or proposed plan that applies at the time the application is considered. A revised application, if within the scope of the application as first lodged and if it is revised no more than is necessary to take account of changes made to the relevant plan, is to be treated as having been received on the date it was first lodged. Clause 43 clarifies the application of sections 124 to 124C of the RMA.
Exclusions
Clause 44 excludes the payment of compensation by the Crown or ECan in relation to the application of this subpart.
Clause 45 excludes sections 76 to 82 of the Local Government Act 2002 (which relate to decision-making processes of local authorities under that Act) from applying to ECan in the performance of its functions and exercise of its powers under this subpart.
Subpart 3—Water conservation orders
Clause 46 excludes the application of Part 9 of the RMA to applications under this subpart for Canterbury WCOs. This exclusion operates from the commencement day to the close of the resumption day, whether or not the WCO application is made before, on, or after the commencement day. Despite that general exclusion, section 217 of the RMA continues to apply to a Canterbury WCO. The clause also provides that certain provisions of the Bill continue to apply after the resumption day, as a transitional measure.
Provisions relating to the processing of applications
Clauses 47 to 49 provide for the application of section 201 of the RMA to how WCO applications are to be lodged, the processing of applications by the Minister, and the responsibility of ECan to notify any application submitted for its consideration by the Minister.
Criteria and process for consideration of applications
Clause 50 provides the criteria to be applied by ECan in considering whether to recommend that the Minister reject the application or make a Canterbury WCO. ECan must, subject to Part 2 of the RMA, have particular regard to the specified matters (which replicate the matters set out in section 199 of the RMA) and the vision and principles of the CWMS, and also have regard for the matters set out in section 207(a) and (b) of the RMA.
Under clause 51, sections 205, 206, and 208 of the RMA apply to the submission, hearing, and reporting processes of ECan.
Appeals on questions of law only
Clauses 52 to 55 exclude the jurisdiction of the Environment Court under this subpart but confer a right of appeal to the High Court, but only on questions of law, setting out the persons to whom this right applies, with a further right of appeal to the Court of Appeal.
Making or declining to make WCO
Clauses 56 and 57 provide for the application of the relevant provisions of the RMA, with the necessary modifications, to the making of a Canterbury WCO and for the prohibitions and restrictions that may be imposed on the exercise of ECan's functions by a WCO.
Revocations and variations
Clause 58 applies section 216(1) and (2) to applications to revoke or vary a Canterbury WCO, and gives the Minister the power, in certain circumstances, to make a recommendation without submitting the application to ECan.
Delegations under this subpart
Clause 59 clarifies the delegations able to be made by ECan under this subpart.
Transitional matters
Clause 60 sets out the transitional matters covered in the 2 Parts of Schedule 2.
Subpart 4—Process for approval of proposed regional policy statements or plans
Preliminary matters
Clause 61 defines the term proposed regional policy statement or plan.
Clause 62 specifies that the provisions of the RMA apply as far as they are relevant to any proposed policy statement or plan, but this application does not override the transitional provision of section 161 of the Resource Management (Simplifying and Streamlining) Amendment Act 2009 that provides for a proposed policy statement or plan notified before 1 October 2009 to be determined under the RMA before it was amended by that Act.
Additional criteria for decision-making
Under clause 63, ECan must have particular regard to the vision and principles of the CWMS, in addition to the matters relevant under the RMA.
Procedural arrangements
Clause 64 provides that clauses 65 to 68 apply only to decisions made by ECan under clause 10 of Schedule 1 of the RMA in respect of which ECan must have particular regard to the vision and principles of the CWMS.
Clause 65 provides for notification of decisions made under clause 11, and clauses 66 to 68 exclude the jurisdiction of the Environment Court but set out the right of appeal on questions of law to the High Court, with a further right of appeal to the Court of Appeal.
Transitional provision
Clause 69 makes provision for transitional procedures if a proposed regional policy statement or plan is already under consideration before the commencement day and after that day ECan cancels delegations that applied while the policy statement or plan was under consideration. The clause protects the integrity of the planning process if the criteria for consideration of a policy statement or plan are changed as a result of the commencement or expiry of subpart 4.
There are 2 schedules. Part 1 of Schedule 1 replicates the vision and principles included in the document known as the Canterbury Water Management Strategy—Strategic Framework, dated November 2009. Part 2 describes the status and preparation of that document.
Part 1 of Schedule 2 sets out transitional arrangements applying to WCO applications the consideration of which has not been completed before the resumption day. Part 2 of Schedule 2 provides transitionally for the Hurunui WCO application. The RMA process for that application ceases on the commencement day and the provisions of Part 2 of Schedule 2 apply instead to that application.