Electricity (Transpower's Transitional Pricing Methodology) Order 2003

  • revoked
  • Electricity (Transpower's Transitional Pricing Methodology) Order 2003: revoked, on 12 May 2011, by clause 3 of the Regulatory Reform (Revocations) Order 2011 (SR 2011/99).

Reprint
as at 12 May 2011

Coat of Arms of New Zealand

Electricity (Transpower's Transitional Pricing Methodology) Order 2003

(SR 2003/141)

Silvia Cartwright, Governor-General

Order in Council

At Wellington this 23rd day of June 2003

Present:
Her Excellency the Governor-General in Council

  • Electricity (Transpower's Transitional Pricing Methodology) Order 2003: revoked, on 12 May 2011, by clause 3 of the Regulatory Reform (Revocations) Order 2011 (SR 2011/99).

Note

Changes authorised by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 have been made in this reprint.

A general outline of these changes is set out in the notes at the end of this reprint, together with other explanatory material about this reprint.

This order is administered by the Ministry of Economic Development.

Pursuant to section 19(6) of the Electricity Amendment Act 2001, Her Excellency the Governor-General, acting on the advice and with the consent of the Executive Council, makes the following order.

Order

1 Title

  • This order is the Electricity (Transpower's Transitional Pricing Methodology) Order 2003.

2 Commencement

  • This order comes into force on 26 July 2003.

3 Extension of transitional period for Transpower's pricing methodology

  • The transitional period referred to in section 19(5) of the Electricity Amendment Act 2001 is extended for a period of 6 months, from the beginning of 26 July 2003 to the close of 26 January 2004.

Marie Shroff,
Clerk of the Executive Council.

Explanatory note

This note is not part of the order, but is intended to indicate its general effect.

This order, which comes into force on 26 July 2003, extends, for 6 months, the fixed end-date of the transitional period during which Transpower's transitional pricing methodology applies. The transitional period would otherwise expire on 26 July 2003.

The effect is that persons with assets that are directly connected to the national grid must continue to pay (to the extent required by section 19 of the Electricity Amendment Act 2001) for grid connection services the amount that is charged by Transpower in accordance with the pricing methodology contained in Pricing for Grid Connection Services from 1 April 2001, as published by Transpower in December 2000.

However, despite the extension in this order, the transitional period would, according to the Act, end before 26 January 2004 if Transpower were authorised or required to use a new pricing methodology by an electricity governance organisation such as the Electricity Governance Board or the Commerce Commission or electricity governance regulations or rules under the Electricity Act 1992. If that happened, the obligation to pay in accordance with the old methodology would cease before 26 January 2004.

Issued under the authority of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989.

Date of notification in Gazette: 26 June 2003.

Contents

  • 1General

  • 2Status of reprints

  • 3How reprints are prepared

  • 4Changes made under section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989

  • 5List of amendments incorporated in this reprint (most recent first)

Notes
1 General

  • This is a reprint of the Electricity (Transpower's Transitional Pricing Methodology) Order 2003. The reprint incorporates all the amendments to the order as at 12 May 2011, as specified in the list of amendments at the end of these notes.

    Relevant provisions of any amending enactments that contain transitional, savings, or application provisions that cannot be compiled in the reprint are also included, after the principal enactment, in chronological order. For more information, see http://www.pco.parliament.govt.nz/reprints/ .

2 Status of reprints

  • Under section 16D of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989, reprints are presumed to correctly state, as at the date of the reprint, the law enacted by the principal enactment and by the amendments to that enactment. This presumption applies even though editorial changes authorised by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 have been made in the reprint.

    This presumption may be rebutted by producing the official volumes of statutes or statutory regulations in which the principal enactment and its amendments are contained.

3 How reprints are prepared

  • A number of editorial conventions are followed in the preparation of reprints. For example, the enacting words are not included in Acts, and provisions that are repealed or revoked are omitted. For a detailed list of the editorial conventions, see http://www.pco.parliament.govt.nz/editorial-conventions/ or Part 8 of the Tables of New Zealand Acts and Ordinances and Statutory Regulations and Deemed Regulations in Force.

4 Changes made under section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989

  • Section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 authorises the making of editorial changes in a reprint as set out in sections 17D and 17E of that Act so that, to the extent permitted, the format and style of the reprinted enactment is consistent with current legislative drafting practice. Changes that would alter the effect of the legislation are not permitted.

    A new format of legislation was introduced on 1 January 2000. Changes to legislative drafting style have also been made since 1997, and are ongoing. To the extent permitted by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989, all legislation reprinted after 1 January 2000 is in the new format for legislation and reflects current drafting practice at the time of the reprint.

    In outline, the editorial changes made in reprints under the authority of section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 are set out below, and they have been applied, where relevant, in the preparation of this reprint:

    • •omission of unnecessary referential words (such as “of this section” and “of this Act”)

    • •typeface and type size (Times Roman, generally in 11.5 point)

    • •layout of provisions, including:

      • •indentation

      • •position of section headings (eg, the number and heading now appear above the section)

    • •format of definitions (eg, the defined term now appears in bold type, without quotation marks)

    • •format of dates (eg, a date formerly expressed as “the 1st day of January 1999” is now expressed as “1 January 1999”)

    • •position of the date of assent (it now appears on the front page of each Act)

    • •punctuation (eg, colons are not used after definitions)

    • •Parts numbered with roman numerals are replaced with arabic numerals, and all cross-references are changed accordingly

    • •case and appearance of letters and words, including:

      • •format of headings (eg, headings where each word formerly appeared with an initial capital letter followed by small capital letters are amended so that the heading appears in bold, with only the first word (and any proper nouns) appearing with an initial capital letter)

      • •small capital letters in section and subsection references are now capital letters

    • •schedules are renumbered (eg, Schedule 1 replaces First Schedule), and all cross-references are changed accordingly

    • •running heads (the information that appears at the top of each page)

    • •format of two-column schedules of consequential amendments, and schedules of repeals (eg, they are rearranged into alphabetical order, rather than chronological).

5 List of amendments incorporated in this reprint (most recent first)

  • Regulatory Reform (Revocations) Order 2011 (SR 2011/99): clause 3