Health Practitioners (Quality Assurance Activities: Rotorua General Practice Group Limited) Notice 2005

  • expired
  • Health Practitioners (Quality Assurance Activities: Rotorua General Practice Group Limited) Notice 2005: expired, on 11 July 2010, pursuant to section 54(4) of the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 (2003 No 48).

Reprint
as at 11 July 2010

Crest

Health Practitioners (Quality Assurance Activities: Rotorua General Practice Group Limited) Notice 2005

(SR 2005/208)

  • Health Practitioners (Quality Assurance Activities: Rotorua General Practice Group Limited) Notice 2005: expired, on 11 July 2010, pursuant to section 54(4) of the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 (2003 No 48).


Note

Changes authorised by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 have been made in this reprint.

A general outline of these changes is set out in the notes at the end of this reprint, together with other explanatory material about this reprint.

This notice is administered by the Ministry of Health.


Pursuant to section 54 of the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003, the Minister of Health gives the following notice.

Notice

1 Title
  • This notice is the Health Practitioners (Quality Assurance Activities: Rotorua General Practice Group Limited) Notice 2005.

2 Commencement
  • This notice comes into force on the day after the date of its notification in the Gazette.

3 Declaration of protected quality assurance activities
  • Each of the following quality assurance activities described in the Schedule is a protected quality assurance activity:

    • (a) Rotorua General Practice Group Limited Audit Activity:

    • (b) Rotorua General Practice Group Limited Peer Review Activity:

    • (c) Rotorua General Practice Group Limited Adverse Outcome Audit Activity.


Schedule
Description of Rotorua General Practice Group Limited Quality Assurance Activities

cl 3

1 Objective
  • The objective of each of the protected quality assurance activities is to improve the practices and competence of health practitioners engaged in the activity by assessing the health services performed by those health practitioners.

2 Information
  • The protected quality assurance activities are based on information derived from health practitioners who provide health services on behalf of Rotorua General Practice Group Limited.

3 Rotorua General Practice Group Limited Audit Activity
  • The Rotorua General Practice Group Limited Audit Activity involves—

    • (a) the collection of the following data from health practitioners:

      • (i) aspects of patient care; and

      • (ii) aspects of patient management; and

      • (iii) drug utilisation; and

      • (iv) laboratory test utilisation; and

      • (v) information systems; and

    • (b) the review and analysis of the data collected under paragraph (a); and

    • (c) the reporting back to health practitioners on the results of the review and analysis undertaken under paragraph (b); and

    • (d) the making of recommendations to a health practitioner engaged in the activity on how that health practitioner may improve his or her performance so as to improve the quality of services he or she provides; and

    • (e) the implementation of the recommendations in paragraph (d).

4 Rotorua General Practice Group Limited Peer Review Activity
  • The Rotorua General Practice Group Limited Peer Review Activity involves the holding of peer review meetings to review—

    • (a) individual patient cases:

    • (b) patient care processes:

    • (c) health practitioners’ medical knowledge:

    • (d) any other matters.

5 Rotorua General Practice Group Limited Adverse Outcome Audit Activity
  • The Rotorua General Practice Group Limited Adverse Outcome Audit Activity involves—

    • (a) the identification, notification, and analysis of any process or practice that results in an outcome for patients which may, but need not, be an adverse outcome; and

    • (b) the preparation of adverse outcome reports; and

    • (c) the preparation of documentation that identifies trends showing up in the reports prepared under paragraph (b); and

    • (d) the holding of meetings to discuss—

      • (i) the results obtained under paragraph (a); and

      • (ii) the reports prepared under paragraph (b); and

      • (iii) the documentation prepared under paragraph (c); and

    • (e) the making of recommendations on how health practitioners who are engaging in the activity can improve their performance so as to reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes; and

    • (f) the facilitation and monitoring of the implementation of any such recommendations; and

    • (g) the compilation and reporting of information obtained from the actions referred to in paragraphs (a) to (f).

Dated at Wellington this 11th day of July 2005.

Hon Annette King,
Minister of Health.


Issued under the authority of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989.

Date of notification in Gazette: 21 July 2005.


Contents

  • 1General

  • 2Status of reprints

  • 3How reprints are prepared

  • 4Changes made under section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989

  • 5List of amendments incorporated in this reprint (most recent first)


Notes
1 General
  • This is a reprint of the Health Practitioners (Quality Assurance Activities: Rotorua General Practice Group Limited) Notice 2005. The reprint incorporates all the amendments to the notice as at 11 July 2010, as specified in the list of amendments at the end of these notes.

    Relevant provisions of any amending enactments that contain transitional, savings, or application provisions that cannot be compiled in the reprint are also included, after the principal enactment, in chronological order. For more information, see http://www.pco.parliament.govt.nz/reprints/ .

2 Status of reprints
  • Under section 16D of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989, reprints are presumed to correctly state, as at the date of the reprint, the law enacted by the principal enactment and by the amendments to that enactment. This presumption applies even though editorial changes authorised by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 have been made in the reprint.

    This presumption may be rebutted by producing the official volumes of statutes or statutory regulations in which the principal enactment and its amendments are contained.

3 How reprints are prepared
  • A number of editorial conventions are followed in the preparation of reprints. For example, the enacting words are not included in Acts, and provisions that are repealed or revoked are omitted. For a detailed list of the editorial conventions, see http://www.pco.parliament.govt.nz/editorial-conventions/ or Part 8 of the Tables of New Zealand Acts and Ordinances and Statutory Regulations and Deemed Regulations in Force.

4 Changes made under section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989
  • Section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 authorises the making of editorial changes in a reprint as set out in sections 17D and 17E of that Act so that, to the extent permitted, the format and style of the reprinted enactment is consistent with current legislative drafting practice. Changes that would alter the effect of the legislation are not permitted.

    A new format of legislation was introduced on 1 January 2000. Changes to legislative drafting style have also been made since 1997, and are ongoing. To the extent permitted by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989, all legislation reprinted after 1 January 2000 is in the new format for legislation and reflects current drafting practice at the time of the reprint.

    In outline, the editorial changes made in reprints under the authority of section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 are set out below, and they have been applied, where relevant, in the preparation of this reprint:

    • omission of unnecessary referential words (such as of this section and of this Act)

    • typeface and type size (Times Roman, generally in 11.5 point)

    • layout of provisions, including:

      • indentation

      • position of section headings (eg, the number and heading now appear above the section)

    • format of definitions (eg, the defined term now appears in bold type, without quotation marks)

    • format of dates (eg, a date formerly expressed as the 1st day of January 1999 is now expressed as 1 January 1999)

    • position of the date of assent (it now appears on the front page of each Act)

    • punctuation (eg, colons are not used after definitions)

    • Parts numbered with roman numerals are replaced with arabic numerals, and all cross-references are changed accordingly

    • case and appearance of letters and words, including:

      • format of headings (eg, headings where each word formerly appeared with an initial capital letter followed by small capital letters are amended so that the heading appears in bold, with only the first word (and any proper nouns) appearing with an initial capital letter)

      • small capital letters in section and subsection references are now capital letters

    • schedules are renumbered (eg, Schedule 1 replaces First Schedule), and all cross-references are changed accordingly

    • running heads (the information that appears at the top of each page)

    • format of two-column schedules of consequential amendments, and schedules of repeals (eg, they are rearranged into alphabetical order, rather than chronological).

5 List of amendments incorporated in this reprint (most recent first)
  • Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 (2003 No 48): section 54(4)