Subject to the concurrence of the Chief Electoral Officer, the Returning Officer shall not accept the nomination of any candidate if the Returning Officer is not satisfied, by such evidence (if any) as he requires, that the name under which the candidate is nominated is—

“Provided that in the case of any female candidate who is or has been married, her husband’s surname may be substituted for her surname in any of the cases specified in paragraphs (a) to (d) of this subsection, unless, if her husband were nominated as a candidate under that surname, the Returning Officer would be required to reject his nomination under the provisions of this subsection.

“Provided also that the Returning Officer may, with the concurrence of the Chief Electoral Officer, accept the nomination of any candidate under a name that does not comply with the foregoing provisions of this subsection, if the Returning Officer is satisfied that the candidate has publicly announced before the commencement of this subsection his intention to become a candidate under that name, and that the name has been adopted by the candidate in good faith and for good reason and is not indecent or offensive or likely to deceive or cause confusion.”