The purpose of this Act is to give effect to certain provisions of the deed of settlement, which is a deed to settle the historical claims of Waitaha.

This Act binds the Crown.

This section is a guide to the overall scheme and effect of this Act, but does not affect the interpretation or application of this Act or of the deed of settlement.

This Part—

Part 2 provides for cultural redress, including—

Part 3 provides for commercial redress, including—

There are 4 schedules, as follows:

The text of the acknowledgements made by the Crown, as set out in the deed of settlement, is as follows:

The Crown acknowledges that Waitaha, an ancient iwi descending from Hei and Waitaha of the waka Te Arawa, has long sought acknowledgement and redress for its grievances. The Crown has failed to deal with these grievances in an appropriate way. The Crown hereby recognises the legitimacy of the historical grievances of Waitaha and makes the following acknowledgements.

The Crown acknowledges that the coming of war to the Bay of Plenty in the 1860s split Waitaha internally. Individuals and hapū were compelled to align themselves with different sides in the conflict and this caused discord and enmity within the iwi, and in the relationships Waitaha had with other iwi and with the Crown.

The Crown acknowledges that—

The Crown acknowledges that—

The Crown acknowledges that, taken together, the Tauranga confiscation/raupatu and the subsequent Tauranga District Lands Acts 1867 and 1868—

The Crown further acknowledges that it—

The Crown acknowledges that the confiscation/raupatu and the subsequent Tauranga District Lands Acts 1867 and 1868—

The Crown acknowledges that in its effects on Waitaha, the confiscation/raupatu and the subsequent Tauranga District Lands Acts 1867 and 1868 were unjust, indiscriminate, and a breach of Te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles.

The Crown acknowledges that—

The Crown acknowledges that the treatment that Waitaha received from the Crown during the bush campaign was unreasonable, inflicted considerable unnecessary harm on Waitaha, and was a breach of Te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles.

The Crown acknowledges that—

The Crown acknowledges that it exploited inter-iwi competition over Te Puke block and used outstanding survey charges and the threat of mortgage to pressure Waitaha into selling the land. The Crown used the Native Lands Act 1877 to prevent Waitaha from selling the land to private parties. The combined effect of these aggressive purchase techniques meant that the Crown failed actively to protect the interests of Waitaha in the land they wished to retain and this was a breach of Te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles.

The Crown acknowledges further land was lost to Waitaha during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries through purchases by private parties of land originally intended to be inalienable, additional Crown purchases and public works takings. These losses came at a time when Waitaha were already experiencing great economic hardship.

The Crown acknowledges that the cumulative effect of its actions has rendered Waitaha virtually landless. By 1900, members of the iwi held only a fraction—approximately 2.5 per cent—of their former rohe. While the land and resources alienated from Waitaha have benefited the nation as a whole, the reserves created for Waitaha from Te Puke block, including “Manoeka”, were insufficient to support or sustain the iwi’s members. This forced some Waitaha to follow their other tribal affiliations, weakening the identity of Waitaha as an iwi. The Crown’s failure to ensure that Waitaha were left with sufficient land for their present and future needs was a breach of Te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles.

The Crown acknowledges that the cumulative effect of its breaches of Te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles undermined the physical, cultural, social, economic and spiritual well-being of Waitaha to the point where the iwi itself nearly vanished. The suffering and marginalisation caused to Waitaha over the generations have continued to the present day.

The text of the apology offered by the Crown to Waitaha, as set out in the deed of settlement, is as follows:

The Crown makes the following apology to the descendants of Hei and Waitaha known as Waitaha.

The Crown is deeply sorry that it has failed to fulfil its obligations to Waitaha under Te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi.

The Crown’s acts and omissions have severed you from almost all of your traditional lands and driven your ancient iwi to the point where it nearly ceased to exist. For these acts and omissions, and for the suffering they caused and continue to cause, the Crown apologises.

The Tauranga confiscation/raupatu was unjust and Hakaraia Mahika opposed it. For this, the Crown labelled him a rebel. In seeking to punish him, the Crown destroyed your houses, crops and livestock, and ultimately took his life. The Crown inflicted further punishment even after his death by unfairly withholding a large amount of land from you. For these misdeeds the Crown apologises to Waitaha and to Hakaraia.

The stigma of rebellion has diminished the mana of Waitaha and forced deep divisions among you, and between you and your neighbours. The Crown recognises that this burden has pressed most heavily on the descendants of Hakaraia, but has affected all of Waitaha. The Crown regrets that you have been forced to bear this stigma, and wishes the mana and reputation of Hakaraia and Waitaha to be restored. Accordingly, the Crown apologises for the part it played in placing this burden upon you.

The Crown wishes to restore its own tarnished honour too and hopes that this apology will mark the beginning of a stronger relationship with Waitaha, a relationship based on trust, co-operation, and respect for Te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi. Accordingly, the Crown echoes the following Waitaha whakatauki:

It is the intention of Parliament that the provisions of this Act be interpreted in a manner that best furthers the agreements expressed in the deed of settlement.

In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,—

In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires, Waitaha—

In this section,—

In this Act (other than in subpart 6 of Part 2), historical claims—

The historical claims are every claim (whether or not the claim has arisen or been considered, researched, notified, or made by or on the settlement date) that Waitaha (or a representative entity) had at, or at any time before, the settlement date, or may have after the settlement date, and that—

The historical claims include—

However, historical claims does not include—

The historical claims are settled.

The settlement of the historical claims is final and, on and from the settlement date, the Crown is released and discharged from all obligations and liabilities in respect of those claims.

Subsections (1) and (2) do not limit the deed of settlement.

Despite any other enactment or rule of law, on and from the settlement date, no court, tribunal, or other judicial body has jurisdiction (including, without limitation, the jurisdiction to inquire or further inquire into, or to make a finding or recommendation) in respect of—

Subsection (4) does not exclude the jurisdiction of a court, tribunal, or other judicial body in respect of the interpretation or implementation of the deed of settlement or this Act.

This section amends the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975.

In Schedule 3, insert in its appropriate alphabetical order “Waitaha Claims Settlement Act 2013, section 12(4) and (5)”.

The enactments listed in subsection (2) do not apply—

The enactments are—

The chief executive of LINZ must issue to the Registrar-General a certificate that identifies (by reference to the relevant legal description, certificate of title, or computer register) each allotment that is—

The chief executive of LINZ must issue a certificate under subsection (1) as soon as is reasonably practicable after—

Each certificate must state that it is issued under this section.

The Registrar-General must, as soon as is reasonably practicable after receiving a certificate issued under subsection (1),—

The rule against perpetuities and the provisions of the Perpetuities Act 1964 do not—

However, if Te Kapu o Waitaha is, or becomes, a charitable trust, the application (if any) of the rule against perpetuities or any provision of the Perpetuities Act 1964 to that trust must be determined under the general law.

Actions or matters occurring under this Act occur or take effect on and from the settlement date.

However, if a provision of this Act requires an action or a matter to occur or take effect on a date other than the settlement date, that action or matter occurs or takes effect on and from that other date.

The chief executive of the Ministry of Justice must make copies of the deed of settlement available—

A responsible Minister may—

A protocol may be amended or cancelled under subsection (1) at the initiative of—

The responsible Minister may amend or cancel a protocol only after consulting, and having particular regard to the views of, the trustees.

A protocol does not restrict—

The Crown must comply with a protocol while it is in force.

If the Crown fails, without good cause, to comply with a protocol, the trustees may, subject to the Crown Proceedings Act 1950, enforce the protocol.

Despite subsection (2), damages or any form of monetary compensation are not available as a remedy for a failure by the Crown to comply with a protocol.

To avoid doubt,—

A summary of the terms of the conservation protocol must be noted in any of the following documents that affect the conservation protocol area:

The noting of the summary is—

The conservation protocol does not have the effect of granting, creating, or providing evidence of—

A summary of the terms of the Crown minerals protocol must be noted in—

The noting of the summary is—

The Crown minerals protocol does not have the effect of granting, creating, or providing evidence of an estate in, or rights relating to, any Crown owned mineral.

In this section, Crown owned mineral and minerals programme have the meanings given to them in section 2(1) of the Crown Minerals Act 1991.

The taonga tūturu protocol does not have the effect of granting, creating, or providing evidence of an estate or interest in, or rights relating to, taonga tūturu.

In this subpart,—

The Crown acknowledges the statements of association.

The only purposes of the statutory acknowledgement are to—

This section applies in relation to an application for a resource consent for an activity within, adjacent to, or directly affecting a statutory area.

On and from the effective date, a relevant consent authority must have regard to the statutory acknowledgement relating to the statutory area in deciding, under section 95E of the Resource Management Act 1991, whether the trustees are affected persons in relation to the activity.

Subsection (2) does not limit the obligations of a relevant consent authority under the Resource Management Act 1991.

This section applies to proceedings before the Environment Court in relation to an application for a resource consent for an activity within, adjacent to, or directly affecting the statutory area.

On and from the effective date, the Environment Court must have regard to the statutory acknowledgement relating to the statutory area in deciding, under section 274 of the Resource Management Act 1991, whether the trustees are persons with an interest in proceedings greater than that of the general public.

Subsection (2) does not limit the obligations of the Environment Court under the Resource Management Act 1991.

If, on or after the effective date, an application is made under section 44, 56, or 61 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 for an authority to undertake an activity that will or may modify or destroy an archaeological site within a statutory area,—

In this section, archaeological site has the meaning given in section 6 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014.

On and from the effective date, each relevant consent authority must attach information recording the statutory acknowledgement to all statutory plans that wholly or partly cover a statutory area.

The information attached to a statutory plan must include—

The attachment of information to a statutory plan under this section is for the purpose of public information only, and the information is not, unless adopted by the relevant consent authority,—

Each relevant consent authority must, for a period of 20 years starting on the effective date, give the following to the trustees for each resource consent application for an activity within, adjacent to, or directly affecting a statutory area:

The information provided in a summary of an application must be the same as would be given to an affected person by limited notification under section 95B of the Resource Management Act 1991, or as may be agreed between the trustees and the relevant consent authority.

A summary of an application must be given under subsection (1)(a)—

A copy of the notice under subsection (1)(b) must be given no later than 10 business days after the day on which the relevant consent authority receives the notice.

This section does not affect a relevant consent authority’s obligation—

The trustees and any member of Waitaha may, as evidence of the association of Waitaha with a statutory area, cite the statutory acknowledgement that relates to that area in submissions to, and in proceedings before, a relevant consent authority, the Environmental Protection Authority or a board of inquiry under Part 6AA of the Resource Management Act 1991, the Environment Court, or Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga concerning activities within, adjacent to, or directly affecting the statutory area.

The content of a statement of association is not, by virtue of the statutory acknowledgement, binding as fact on—

Despite subsection (2), the statutory acknowledgement may be taken into account by the bodies and persons specified in that subsection.

To avoid doubt,—

The trustees may waive the right to be given summaries, and copies of notices, of resource consent applications under section 32 in relation to a statutory area.

The trustees may waive the right to have a relevant consent authority, the Environment Court, or Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga have regard to the statutory acknowledgement under sections 28 to 30 in relation to a statutory area.

Rights must be waived by written notice to the relevant consent authority, the Environment Court, or Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga, stating—

An obligation under this subpart does not apply to the extent that the corresponding right has been waived under this section.

If a statutory acknowledgement applies to a river or stream, that part of the acknowledgement—

If a statutory acknowledgement applies to the coastal marine area, the acknowledgement does not apply to any specified freehold land in the area.

The Minister of Conservation and the Director-General may—

A deed of recognition must be substantially in the form set out in part 3 of the documents schedule.

If a deed of recognition applies to a river or stream, the deed—

If a deed of recognition applies to the coastal marine area, the deed does not apply to any specified freehold land in the area.

Except as expressly provided in this subpart,—

Subsection (1)(b) does not limit subsection (1)(a).

Except as expressly provided in this subpart, the statutory acknowledgement and the deed of recognition do not affect the lawful rights or interests of any person who is not a party to the deed of settlement.

Except as expressly provided in this subpart, the statutory acknowledgement and the deed of recognition do not have the effect of granting, creating, or providing evidence of an estate or interest in, or rights relating to, a statutory area.

This section amends the Resource Management Act 1991.

In Schedule 11, insert in its appropriate alphabetical order “Waitaha Claims Settlement Act 2013”.

In this Act, Te Whakairinga Kōrero means the application of this subpart to Ōtawa and Te Ara a Hei.

In this subpart,—

The following sites are subject to an overlay classification called Te Whakairinga Kōrero:

The sites are described in Schedule 2.

The Crown acknowledges the statements of Waitaha values relating to Ōtawa and Te Ara a Hei respectively.

The only purposes of the declaration of Te Whakairinga Kōrero and of the Crown’s acknowledgement of Waitaha values in relation to Ōtawa and Te Ara a Hei are—

The trustees and the Crown may agree on and publicise protection principles.

The purpose of the protection principles is to assist the Minister of Conservation in avoiding—

The protection principles set out in part 1 of the documents schedule in relation to Ōtawa and Te Ara a Hei at the settlement date are to be treated as having been agreed by the trustees and the Crown under subsection (1).

The trustees and the Crown may amend the protection principles by agreement in writing.

Despite subsection (3), the Crown may amend the protection principles to take account of a deed of settlement entered into by the Crown with another person or group with an interest in Ōtawa or Te Ara a Hei.

However, before amending the protection principles under subsection (5), the Crown must consult the trustees.

This section applies when the New Zealand Conservation Authority or a conservation board considers or approves a conservation management strategy, a conservation management plan, or a national park management plan in relation to a Te Whakairinga Kōrero site.

The New Zealand Conservation Authority or the conservation board must have particular regard to—

This section applies before the New Zealand Conservation Authority or a conservation board approves a conservation management strategy, a conservation management plan, or a national park management plan in relation to a Te Whakairinga Kōrero site.

The New Zealand Conservation Authority or the conservation board must—

This section applies if the trustees advise the New Zealand Conservation Authority in writing that they have significant concerns about a draft conservation management strategy that relates to a Te Whakairinga Kōrero site.

The New Zealand Conservation Authority must, before approving the strategy, give the trustees an opportunity to make submissions in relation to their concerns.

The declaration of Te Whakairinga Kōrero must be noted in the following documents if the documents affect a Te Whakairinga Kōrero site:

The noting of Te Whakairinga Kōrero under subsection (1)—

As soon as practicable after the settlement date, the Minister of Conservation must notify in the Gazette—

The Minister of Conservation must notify any amendments to the protection principles made under section 45 in the Gazette as soon as practicable after the amendment has been made.

The Director-General may, at his or her discretion, notify in the Gazette any action taken or intended to be taken under any of sections 51 to 54.

Following notification in the Gazette of the protection principles, the Director-General—

The Director-General retains a complete discretion to determine the method and extent of the action to be taken.

The Director-General must notify the trustees of any action the Director-General intends to take.

If requested in writing by the trustees, the Director-General must not take action in respect of the protection principles to which the request relates.

Subsection (1) applies subject to subsections (2) to (4).

The Director-General may initiate an amendment to a conservation management strategy or plan, or a national park management plan to incorporate objectives relating to the protection principles (including incorporating a recommendation to promulgate regulations or make bylaws).

The Director-General must consult affected conservation boards before initiating an amendment under subsection (1).

An amendment initiated under subsection (1) is an amendment for the purposes of section 17I(1) to (3) of the Conservation Act 1987 or section 46(1) to (4) of the National Parks Act 1980, as the case requires.

This section does not limit section 51(2).

The Governor-General may, by Order in Council made on the recommendation of the Minister of Conservation, make regulations for the following purposes:

The Minister of Conservation may make bylaws for the following purposes:

Bylaws made under this section—

This section amends this Act and takes effect on the repeal by the Legislation Act 2012 of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 and the Regulations (Disallowance) Act 1989.

Amendment(s) incorporated in the Act(s).

This section applies if Te Whakairinga Kōrero applies to any land in—

Te Whakairinga Kōrero does not affect—

The Governor-General may, by Order in Council made on the recommendation of the Minister of Conservation, declare that all or part of Ōtawa or Te Ara a Hei is no longer subject to Te Whakairinga Kōrero.

The Minister of Conservation must not make a recommendation for the purposes of subsection (1) unless the trustees and the Minister of Conservation have agreed in writing that Te Whakairinga Kōrero status is no longer appropriate for the area concerned and—

Subsection (4) applies if—

The Crown must take reasonable steps to try to ensure that the trustees continue to have the opportunity to contribute to the management of the area concerned.

Except as expressly provided in this subpart,—

Except as expressly provided in this subpart, the declaration of Te Whakairinga Kōrero and the Crown’s acknowledgement of Waitaha values do not affect the lawful rights or interests of a person who is not a party to the deed of settlement.

Except as expressly provided in this subpart, the declaration of Te Whakairinga Kōrero and the Crown’s acknowledgement of Waitaha values do not have the effect of granting, creating, or providing evidence of an estate or interest in, or rights relating to, Ōtawa and Te Ara a Hei.

The provision of the specified cultural redress does not prevent the Crown from doing anything that is consistent with that cultural redress, including—

However, subsection (1) is not an acknowledgement by the Crown or Waitaha that any other iwi or group has interests in relation to land or an area to which any of the specified cultural redress relates.

In this section, specified cultural redress means each of the following, as provided for in this subpart:

In this subpart and subpart 7,—

The Crown’s interest in the kaumātua flats vests in the trustees.

The fee simple estate in the Hine Poto site vests in the trustees.

The fee simple estate in the Ohineangaanga site vests in the trustees.

The fee simple estate in Te Haehae vests in the trustees.

The fee simple estate in Whitikiore vests in the trustees.

The Crown must, by or on the settlement date, provide the trustees with a registrable right of way easement that provides the trustees with access to Whitikiore from Simpson Road over the areas shown marked A, C, and D on SO 450797.

The right of way easement must be substantially in the form set out in part 10 of the documents schedule.

The reservation of the Maungaruahine Pā Historic Reserve (being Maungaruahine Pa Historic Reserve) as a historic reserve subject to section 18 of the Reserves Act 1977 is revoked.

The fee simple estate in the Maungaruahine Pā Historic Reserve vests in the trustees.

The Maungaruahine Pā Historic Reserve is declared a reserve and classified as a historic reserve subject to section 18 of the Reserves Act 1977.

The name of the reserve created by subsection (3) is the Maungaruahine Pā Historic Reserve.

The trustees are the administering body of the Maungaruahine Pā Historic Reserve for the purposes of the Reserves Act 1977.

This section applies to all, or a part, of the Maungaruahine Pā Historic Reserve that, at any time after vesting in the trustees under section 68, remains a reserve under the Reserves Act 1977 (the reserve land).

The fee simple estate in the reserve land may be transferred to any other person, but only in accordance with this section, despite any other enactment or rule of law.

The Minister of Conservation must give written consent to the transfer of the fee simple estate in the reserve land to another person or persons (the new owners) if, upon written application, the registered proprietors of the reserve land satisfy the Minister that the new owners are able to—

The Registrar-General must, upon receiving the documents specified in subsection (5), register the new owners as the proprietors of the fee simple estate in the reserve land.

The documents are—

The new owners, from the time of registration under subsection (4),—

Despite subsections (1) and (2), subsections (3) to (6) do not apply to the transfer of the fee simple estate in reserve land if—

The reservation, subject to section 19 of the Reserves Act 1977, of the Ōtara Scenic Reserve (being part of the Otawa Scenic Reserve) is revoked.

The fee simple estate in the Ōtara Scenic Reserve vests in the trustees.

The Ōtara Scenic Reserve is declared a reserve and classified as a scenic reserve for the purposes specified in section 19(1)(a) of the Reserves Act 1977.

The name of the reserve created under subsection (3) is the Ōtara Scenic Reserve.

The trustees are the administering body of the Ōtara Scenic Reserve for the purposes of the Reserves Act 1977.

The trustees must not transfer the fee simple estate in the Ōtara Scenic Reserve to a person other than the Crown.

However, the trustees may transfer the fee simple estate in the Ōtara Scenic Reserve to transferees who are the trustees of Te Kapu o Waitaha, after any new trustee has been appointed to the trust or any transferor has ceased to be a trustee of the trust, only if the transfer instrument is accompanied by a certificate given by the transferees, or the transferees’ solicitor, verifying that this subsection applies.

In this subpart, unless the context otherwise requires,—

This subpart takes effect on and from a date specified by Order in Council made on the recommendation of the Minister of Conservation.

The Minister must not make a recommendation unless and until—

The iwi are:

Ōtanewainuku ceases to be a conservation area under the Conservation Act 1987.

The fee simple estate in Ōtanewainuku vests as undivided equal shares in the following as tenants in common:

Ōtanewainuku is declared a reserve and classified as a scenic reserve subject to section 19(1)(a) of the Reserves Act 1977.

The reserve is named Ōtanewainuku Scenic Reserve.

The joint management body established by section 76 is the administering body of the reserve, and the Reserves Act 1977 applies to the reserve as if the reserve were vested in the body (as if the body were trustees) under section 26 of that Act.

Subsections (1) to (5) do not take effect until the persons described in subsection (2) have provided the Crown with a registrable easement in gross for a right of way over Ōtanewainuku on the terms and conditions set out in part 11 of the documents schedule.

Despite the provisions of the Reserves Act 1977, the easement—

Pūwhenua ceases to be a conservation area under the Conservation Act 1987.

The fee simple estate in Pūwhenua vests as undivided equal shares in the following as tenants in common:

Pūwhenua is declared a reserve and classified as a scenic reserve subject to section 19(1)(a) of the Reserves Act 1977.

The reserve is named Pūwhenua Scenic Reserve.

The joint management body established by section 76 is the administering body of the reserve, and the Reserves Act 1977 applies to the reserve as if the reserve were vested in the body (as if the body were trustees) under section 26 of that Act.

A joint management body is established for Ōtanewainuku Scenic Reserve and Pūwhenua Scenic Reserve.

The following are appointers for the purposes of this section:

Each appointer may appoint 1 member to the joint management body.

A member is appointed only if the appointer gives written notice with the following details to the other appointers:

An appointment ends after 5 years or when the appointer replaces the member by making another appointment.

A member may be appointed, reappointed, or discharged at the discretion of the appointer.

Sections 32 to 34 of the Reserves Act 1977 apply to the joint management body as if it were a board.

However, the first meeting of the body must be held no later than 2 months after the vesting date.

The registered proprietors of an undivided share in the fee simple estate in a joint cultural redress property must not transfer the undivided share.

However, the registered proprietors may transfer the undivided share if—

This section applies if a provision in this Act has the same effect as a provision in another Act for 1 of the following properties:

The provisions must be given effect to only once, as if they were 1 provision.

Each joint cultural redress property vests under this subpart subject to, or together with, any encumbrances listed for the property in Schedule 4 or granted in relation to the property before the vesting date.

This section applies to a joint cultural redress property while all or part of the property remains a reserve under the Reserves Act 1977 (the reserve land).

If the property is affected by an encumbrance that is an interest in land listed for the property in Schedule 4 or that is granted in relation to the property before the vesting date, the encumbrance applies as if the administering body were the grantor, or the grantee, as the case may be, of the encumbrance in respect of the reserve land.

Any encumbrance that is an interest in land that affects the reserve land must be dealt with for the purposes of registration as if the administering body were the registered proprietor of the land.

However, subsections (2) and (3) do not affect the registration of the easement referred to in section 74(6).

This section applies if a joint cultural redress property is subject to an encumbrance (other than an interest in land) that is listed for the property in Schedule 4 or that is granted in relation to the property before the vesting date for which there is a grantor, whether or not the encumbrance also applies to land outside the joint cultural redress property.

The encumbrance applies as if the owners of the joint cultural redress property were the grantor of the encumbrance in respect of the property, except to the extent that subsection (3) applies.

If all or part of the joint cultural redress property is reserve land to which section 80 applies, the encumbrance applies as if the administering body of the reserve land were the grantor of the encumbrance in respect of the reserve land.

The encumbrance applies—

This section applies in relation to the fee simple estate in a joint cultural redress property vested under this subpart.

The Registrar-General must, in accordance with an application received from an authorised person,—

Subsection (2) applies subject to the completion of any survey necessary to create a computer freehold register.

A computer freehold register must be created under this section as soon as is reasonably practicable after the vesting date, but no later than—

In this section, authorised person means a person authorised by the Director-General.

The vesting of the fee simple estate in a joint cultural redress property under this subpart is a disposition for the purposes of Part 4A of the Conservation Act 1987, but sections 24, 24A, and 24AA of that Act do not apply to the disposition.

If the reservation of a joint cultural redress property under section 74(3) or 75(3) is revoked in relation to all or part of the property, then the vesting is no longer exempt from section 24 (except subsection (2A)) of the Conservation Act 1987 in relation to all or that part of the property.

The Registrar-General must record on the computer freehold register for a joint cultural redress property that—

A record made under subsection (1) that land is subject to Part 4A of the Conservation Act 1987 is to be treated as having been made under section 24D(1) of that Act.

If the reservation under section 74(3) or 75(3) is revoked for—

The Registrar-General must comply with an application received in accordance with subsection (3)(a).

Section 11 and Part 10 of the Resource Management Act 1991 do not apply to—

The vesting of the fee simple estate in a joint cultural redress property under this subpart does not—

The permission of a council under section 348 of the Local Government Act 1974 is not required for laying out, forming, granting, or reserving a private road, private way, or right of way required to fulfil the terms of the deed of settlement in relation to a joint cultural redress property.

Despite sections 48A(6), 114(5), and 115(6) of the Reserves Act 1977, sections 48A, 114, and 115 of that Act apply to a joint cultural redress property.

Sections 78(1)(a), 79 to 81, and 88 of the Reserves Act 1977 do not apply in relation to a joint cultural redress property.

If the reservation under section 74(3) or 75(3) of a joint cultural redress property as a reserve is revoked under section 24 of the Reserves Act 1977 in relation to all or part of the property, section 25 of that Act, except subsection (2) of that provision, does not apply to the revocation.

The registered proprietors of a joint cultural redress property must not mortgage, or give a security interest in, all or any part of the property that, at any time after vesting under section 74 or 75, remains a reserve under the Reserves Act 1977.

This section applies to any bylaw, or any prohibition or restriction on use or access, that an administering body or the Minister made or imposed under the Reserves Act 1977 or the Conservation Act 1987 in relation to a joint cultural redress property before the property vested under section 74 or 75.

The bylaw, prohibition, or restriction remains in force until it expires or is revoked under the Reserves Act 1977 or the Conservation Act 1987.

A joint cultural redress property is not a Crown protected area.

The Minister must not change the name of a joint cultural redress property under section 16(10) of the Reserves Act 1977 without the written consent of the administering body of the property, and section 16(10A) of that Act does not apply to the proposed change.

In this section, Crown protected area has the meaning given by section 4 of the New Zealand Geographic Board (Ngā Pou Taunaha o Aotearoa) Act 2008.

Each cultural redress property vests under subpart 5 subject to, or together with, any encumbrances listed in relation to the property in Schedule 3.

This section applies in relation to the fee simple estate in a cultural redress property vested in the trustees under subpart 5.

The Registrar-General must, on written application by an authorised person, comply with subsections (3) and (4).

To the extent that a cultural redress property is all of the land contained in a computer freehold register, the Registrar-General must—

To the extent that a cultural redress property is not all of the land contained in a computer freehold register, or there is no computer freehold register for all or part of the property, the Registrar-General must, in accordance with an application received from an authorised person,—

Subsection (4) applies subject to the completion of any survey necessary to create the computer freehold register.

A computer freehold register must be created under this section as soon as is reasonably practicable after the settlement date, but no later than—

In subsections (2) and (4), authorised person means a person authorised by the chief executive of the land holding agency.

The vesting of the fee simple estate in a cultural redress property in the trustees under subpart 5 is a disposition for the purposes of Part 4A of the Conservation Act 1987, but sections 24(2A), 24A, and 24AA of that Act do not apply to the disposition.

Despite subsection (1), the rest of section 24 of the Conservation Act 1987 does not apply to the vesting of a reserve site under section 68 or 70.

If the reservation of a reserve site under section 68(3) or 70(3) is revoked in relation to all or part of the site, then the vesting is no longer exempt from the rest of section 24 of the Conservation Act 1987 in relation to all or that part of the site.

The Registrar-General must record on the computer freehold register for—

A record made under subsection (1) that land is subject to Part 4A of the Conservation Act 1987 is to be treated as having been made under section 24D(1) of that Act.

If the reservation under section 68(3) of the Maungaruahine Pā Historic Reserve is revoked in relation to—

If the reservation under section 70(3) of the Ōtara Scenic Reserve is revoked in relation to—

The Registrar-General must comply with an application received in accordance with subsection (3)(a) or (4)(a).

Sections 24 and 25 of the Reserves Act 1977 do not apply to the revocation, under sections 68(1) and 70(1), of the reserve status of a reserve site.

Section 11 and Part 10 of the Resource Management Act 1991 do not apply to—

The vesting of the fee simple estate in a cultural redress property under subpart 5 does not—

The permission of a council under section 348 of the Local Government Act 1974 is not required for laying out, forming, granting, or reserving a private road, private way, or right of way required to fulfil the terms of the deed of settlement in relation to a cultural redress property.

Despite sections 48A(6), 114(5), and 115(6) of the Reserves Act 1977, sections 48A, 114, and 115 of that Act apply to a reserve site.

Sections 78(1)(a), 79 to 81, and 88 of the Reserves Act 1977 do not apply in relation to a reserve site.

If the reservation under section 68(3) or 70(3) of a reserve site is revoked under section 24 of the Reserves Act 1977 in relation to all or part of the site, section 25 of that Act, except subsection (2) of that provision, does not apply to the revocation.

The registered proprietors of a reserve site must not mortgage, or give a security interest in, all or any part of the site that, at any time after vesting in the trustees under section 68 or 70, remains a reserve under the Reserves Act 1977.

This section applies to any bylaw, or any prohibition or restriction on use or access, that an administering body or the Minister made or imposed under the Reserves Act 1977 or the Conservation Act 1987 in relation to a reserve site before the site vested in the trustees under section 68 or 70.

The bylaw, prohibition, or restriction remains in force until it expires or is revoked under the Reserves Act 1977 or the Conservation Act 1987.

If a site vested under section 68 or 70 comprised, immediately before the vesting, the whole of a reserve, and an official geographic name was assigned under the New Zealand Geographic Board (Ngā Pou Taunaha o Aotearoa) Act 2008 to the site,—

However, if a site vested under section 68 or 70 comprises only part of a reserve,—

If a site is vested under section 68 or 70 and reserved and classified as a historic reserve or a scenic reserve under that section, the historic reserve or scenic reserve does not become a Crown protected area.

In this section,—