Sentencing (Reform) Amendment Bill - Amendment paper No 246
Sentencing (Reform) Amendment Bill - Amendment paper No 246
Checking for alerts... Loading...
Sentencing (Reform) Amendment Bill - Amendment paper No 246
No 246
House of Representatives
Amendment Paper
Sentencing (Reform) Amendment Bill
Proposed amendments
Dr Lawrence Xu-Nan, in Committee, to move the following amendments:
Clause 5A
In clause 5A, new section 8A(3), replace “9B” (page 6, line 11) with “9F”.
In clause 5A, delete new section 8A(3)(a) (page 6, lines 12 and 13).
Clause 7
In clause 7, in the heading, replace “9B” with “9F” (page 8, line 5).
In clause 7, delete the cross-heading above new section 9B (page 9, line 1).
In clause 7, delete new sections 9B to 9EA (page 9, lines 2 to 36).
In clause 7, delete new section 9O(4)(a) (page 15, lines 21 and 22).
In clause 7, new section 9R, delete “9B,” (page 16, line 4).
Explanatory note
This Amendment Paper amends clause 7 of the Sentencing (Reform) Amendment Bill to retain the mitigating factor for youth at sentencing. This implements the recommendation from Mana Mokopuna who stated that Article 40 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child guarantees the right of mokopuna to be dealt with in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child’s sense of dignity and worth and takes into account the child’s age. The youth factor discount is intended to ensure the sentencing of young offenders takes into account a range of factors that may reduce the culpability of young offenders and/or takes into account the opportunities for rehabilitation. It is clear that reducing the ability for mokopuna under 18 to access the youth factor, leading to harsher sentences, is inconsistent with their rights under Article 40 to be “treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child’s sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child’s respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child’s age and the desirability of promoting the child’s reintegration and the child’s assuming a constructive role in society”. Limiting the youth discount to a first (or singular) sentencing is not evidence-based, and is in fact contrary to the scientific evidence. It is likely to produce unjust outcomes.
"Related Legislation
"Related Legislation
"Related Legislation
Versions
Sentencing (Reform) Amendment Bill - Amendment paper No 246
RSS feed link copied, you can now paste this link into your feed reader.