General policy statement
This Bill is an omnibus Bill that amends more than 1 Act and is introduced under Standing Order 263(a) because the amendments deal with an interrelated topic that can be regarded as implementing a single broad policy. That single broad policy is to establish a fit-for-purpose legal framework for managing the unprecedented circumstances of the COVID-19 epidemic in a co-ordinated and orderly way, even if there is no longer a national state of emergency. To this end, this Bill establishes standalone legislation that provides a different legal framework for responding to COVID-19 over the next 2 years or until COVID-19 is sooner brought under control.
In addition to this, the Bill—
(a)
will apply to all Alert Levels under the COVID-19 Alert Level Framework; and
(b)
addresses the need for some enforcement powers for certain restrictions that may be applied so that these restrictions do not rely on powers provided by a state of national emergency—at Alert Level 2 this may include gatherings and distancing; and
(c)
establishes decision-making processes that are more modern and consistent with recommended practice by legal academics and others; and
(d)
has limited retrospective effect to enable the Alert Level 2 order to be prepared and commence immediately, if needed; and
(e)
does not provide retrospective validation of actions already taken on previous orders.
The measures in the Bill take account of the particular characteristics of COVID-19 such as its contagious nature and potential for asymptomatic transmission, which create the risk of spread and a need to impose restrictions at an aggregate as well as an individual level.
The Bill also amends the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002. The objectives of those amendments are to ensure a nationally consistent approach to the response to and management of risks arising from COVID-19 and to better deal with concurrent emergencies during the COVID-19 response.
Purpose
The purpose of the Bill is to support a public health response to COVID-19 that—
prevents, and limits the risk of, the outbreak or spread of COVID-19 (taking into account the asymptomatic and contagious nature of COVID-19); and
avoids, mitigates, or remedies the actual or potential adverse effects of the COVID-19 outbreak (whether direct or indirect); and
is co-ordinated, orderly, and proportionate; and
has enforceable measures in addition to voluntary measures and public health and other guidance.
Power to set enforceable measures
The Bill aims to achieve this purpose by providing that, following the declaration of a state of emergency, the issuing of an epidemic notice, or an authorisation of the Prime Minister, the Minster of Health is given powers to issue orders to give effect to the public health response. This is a change to the position under the Health Act 1956, which made the Director-General of Health (exercising the powers of a medical officer of health) the decision maker for orders. The reasons for making the Minister of Health the decision maker are—
it is more consistent with existing legislative conventions. The scale and wide-ranging implications (health, economic, and social) of the decision making lend themselves to ministerial-level accountability, where a wider range of ministerial portfolios can have input. This positions Cabinet and the Director-General of Health in a more conventional decision-making relationship:
it allows for public health expertise to remain at the centre of decision making. It does this by providing that the Minister of Health is the decision maker, and requiring that the Minister of Health have regard to the advice of the Director-General of Health:
it allows for a wider range of Ministerial portfolios to have input, while allowing the advice of the Director-General of Health to be focused on public health needs and medical expertise.
The power to make orders under the Bill—
is broadly based on the powers in sections 70 and 92I of the Health Act 1956:
can be expressly exercised in respect of classes of people, businesses, and other activities (such as sporting events, weddings, funerals, etc), and may apply nationally or to a specified area:
allows for the same kind of measures to be put in place that have been imposed under the various Health Act 1956 orders to date and that are envisaged under the COVID-19 Alert Level Framework:
contains the ability to place conditions on the controls made under the orders.
The Minister must be satisfied that the order is appropriate to achieve the purpose of the Bill.
Safeguards
The Bill includes a number of safeguards around the exercise of the Minister’s power to issue orders. Before issuing an order, the Minister must have regard to advice from the Director-General of Health. The Minister may also have regard to any government decision on the risks. The Minister must consult the Prime Minister and the Minister of Justice, and may consult any other Minister that the Minister of Health thinks fit.
Orders are also disallowable instruments and will be automatically revoked if not confirmed by the House of Representatives. Orders must also be published in the Gazette and on an Internet site maintained by the New Zealand Government 48 hours prior to coming into force unless they need to come into force urgently to prevent or contain the outbreak or spread of COVID-19. Orders must also be presented to the House of Representatives as soon as practicable after they are made.
Enforcement
As with the orders made under the Health Act 1956, non-compliance with orders provided for in the Bill may result in imprisonment or a fine on conviction. A mental element (for example, the person acted intentionally) has been included in these offences to reflect the severity of conviction as a penalty. To further support the enforcement of health measures in the orders and to promote greater compliance, infringement offences have been added for non-compliance with orders. Businesses that do not comply with orders (for example, by not ensuring physical distance requirements are met by customers and staff) can be ordered to close for up to 24 hours. The policy objective underpinning these enforcement measures is to enable a graduated response approach to offending.
To enable enforcement of the measures in orders, the Police are given a power to enter premises, including private dwellinghouses and marae, without a warrant if they have reasonable grounds to believe that people have gathered there in contravention of an order and entry is necessary for the purpose of giving people a direction to comply with the order (for example, giving an order to disperse). Enforcement officers can enter without a warrant any premises other than private dwellinghouses and marae if they have reasonable grounds to believe that a person is failing to comply with any aspect of an order.