Government Bill
268—3
As reported from the committee of the whole House
text inserted
text deleted
Hover your cursor over an amendment for information about that amendment. Download the PDF version to see this information in a form that can be printed out.
Hon Jan Tinetti
The Parliament of New Zealand enacts as follows:
This Act is the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification (Urgent Interim Classification of Publications and Prevention of Online Harm) Amendment Act 2020.
This Act comes into force on 30 April 2021 1 February 2022.
This Act amends the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993.
(1)
In section 2, replace the definition of Inspector with:
Inspector means an Inspector of Publications holding office under section 103(1) or (2), and includes a constable except for the purposes of Part 7A (see section 103(3))
(2)
In section 2, definition of publication, paragraph (d), after “statements,”, insert “sounds,”.
“statements,”
“sounds,”
(3)
In section 2, definition of publication, after paragraph (d), insert:
a copy of images or sounds that have been livestreamed, but not the livestreaming itself of those images or sounds (livestream has the meaning given in section 119A)
(4)
In section 2, insert in its appropriate alphabetical order:
online content host has the meaning given in section 119A as qualified by section 119B
After section 4, insert:
Sections 23 to 25 of the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015, which relate to the liability of an online content host for content posted by a user, do not apply to processes or proceedings under Part 7A relating to online publications hosted by them.
After section 13(1)(b), insert:
subject to subsections (1A) and (1B), an online content host who or that has been issued with a take-down notice relating to an online publication:
After section 13(1), insert:
(1A)
A submission by an online content host under subsection (1)(ba) must be submitted within 20 working days after they receive the take-down notice.
(1B)
The Chief Censor may determine that an online publication submitted to the Classification Office under subsection (1)(ba) will not be examined or classified by the office if—
the online publication has already been submitted to the Classification Office under this section; or
the online publication has already been the subject of a classification decision; or
the Chief Censor considers that the submitting of the online publication to the Classification Office is frivolous or vexatious.
In section 14(1), replace “subsection (1)(a) or (b)” with “subsection (1)(a), (ab), or (b)”.
“subsection (1)(a) or (b)”
“subsection (1)(a), (ab), or (b)”
After section 14, insert:
An online content host who or that wishes to submit a publication to the Classification Office under section 13(1)(ba) must lodge a notice of submission in the prescribed manner with the Classification Office.
A notice of submission must be in the form provided for that purpose by the Chief Censor and must be accompanied by the prescribed fee (if any).
After section 22, insert:
This section applies to a publication submitted to the Classification Office for classification under section 13.
The Classification Office may make an interim classification assessment that the publication is likely to be objectionable.
The Classification Office may do so only if the Chief Censor believes that there is an urgent need to notify the public that the content of the publication is likely to be objectionable.
The following sections apply to the making of an interim assessment:
sections 14, 14A, 15, 17 to 19, 21, and 22; and
section 20, as modified by subsection (5).
(5)
The Chief Censor may determine that submissions by the persons listed in section 20(1) must be made in a manner and within a time that the Chief Censor specifies after taking into account what is reasonable in the circumstances, including the need for urgency in dealing with the matter.
(5A)
The Classification Office may make an interim assessment on the basis of the information that is readily available to it if the Chief Censor considers it is reasonable in the circumstances, including the need for urgency in dealing with the matter.
(6)
The making of an interim assessment is not a relevant consideration for the purpose of, and does not affect, the later examination and classification of the same publication under section 23.
The Classification Office must give written notice to the submitter that an interim classification assessment has been made.
The notice must contain the following:
a description of the publication that was the subject of the interim assessment; and
a summary of the reasons for the interim assessment.
An interim assessment must be registered under section 39, and that section applies as if the interim assessment were a classification decision, except that the following information must be entered in the register (instead of the information in section 39(3)(a) to (c)):
a statement that an interim assessment has been made of the publication and the date on which the assessment was made; and
the date on which notice of the interim assessment was given under subsection (1) (if applicable); and
the date of entry of the interim assessment in the register.
An interim assessment has effect for an interim period.
An interim period begins on the date an interim assessment is made and ends on the sooner of—
20 working days after the date of the interim assessment:
the date on which a classification decision is made for the relevant publication.
This Act applies to a publication during an interim period as if it had been classified as being objectionable under section 23.
A person, on request and on payment of the applicable fee (if any) as determined by the Classification Office, is entitled to a copy of a notice given under this section.
Compare: 1993 No 94 ss 38, 39
The following people are immune from civil and criminal liability for actions done in good faith when carrying out or intending to carry out their official duties relating to interim classification assessments:
the Chief Censor:
the Deputy Chief Censor:
a classification officer:
a member of the staff of the Classification Office:
a member of the staff of the Department of Internal Affairs:
an Inspector.
Compare: 1993 No 94 ss 119, 137
A service provider or an online content host is immune from civil and criminal liability if they remove, or prevent access by the public in New Zealand to, an online publication that is the subject of an interim classification assessment.
In this section,—
online publication has the meaning given in section 119A
service provider has the meaning given in section 122A.
After section 38(2)(a), insert:
the reasons an interim classification assessment was made under section 22A (if applicable), including the reasons for the Chief Censor’s belief described in section 22A(3); and
In section 103(3), after “Act”, insert “except for the purposes of Part 7A”.
“Act”
“except for the purposes of Part 7A”
After section 119, insert:
In this Part, section 149(ab), and any regulations made under section 149(ab),—
livestream means to transmit over the Internet or any other electronic medium images or sounds as they happen
online content host, in relation to an online publication, means the person who or that has control over the part of the electronic retrieval system, such as an Internet site or an online application or similar, on which the publication is accessible
online publication means—
a publication under paragraph (d) of the definition of publication in section 2 that is accessible on an Internet site or an online application or similar; or
a publication under paragraph (e) of the definition of publication in section 2 (a copy of content that was livestreamed) that is accessible on an Internet site or an online application or similar; or
livestreamed content.
The definition of online publication in subsection (1) does not limit the definition of publication in section 2 for other purposes of this Act.
This Part and any regulations made under section 149(ab) apply to—
individuals in New Zealand (the public); and
online content hosts that provide services to the public regardless of whether an online content host is resident or incorporated in New Zealand or outside New Zealand.
An Inspector may issue a take-down notice relating to a particular online publication to an online content host if—
an interim classification assessment has been made under section 22A that the online publication is likely to be objectionable; or
the online publication has been classified as objectionable under section 23; or
the Inspector believes, on reasonable grounds, that the online publication is objectionable.
Before issuing a take-down notice, an Inspector may, but is not required to, request that the online content host remove, or prevent access by the public to, the online publication.
A take-down notice issued under subsection (1)(a) has effect for the interim period referred to in section 22B(4) for the relevant interim assessment unless subsection (4) applies.
A take-down notice issued under subsection (1)(a) has permanent effect if a classification decision is made that the online publication is objectionable on and from the date of that decision.
A take-down notice issued under subsection (1)(b) or (c) has permanent effect on and from the date it is issued.
In each case the Inspector must notify the Chief Censor that a take-down notice has been issued.
(7)
See section 119J for review of a take-down notice.
Compare: 1993 No 94 s 108(1)
A take-down notice must—
contain a description of the relevant online publication; and
identify the URL or other unique identifier of the online publication; and
require the online content host to remove, or prevent access by the public to, the online publication as soon as is reasonably practicable after receipt of the notice and no later than the time and date specified in the notice (the required period); and
inform the online content host of the right of review under section 119J; and
contain other information required by regulations made under section 149(ab) (if any).
When deciding on the length of the required period in a particular case, an Inspector must consider what period is likely to be reasonably practicable for the online content host to comply with the notice.
A take-down notice may also require an online content host to preserve a copy of the relevant online publication for the purpose of an investigation or proceedings.
A take-down notice may contain other information that an Inspector considers is useful or appropriate.
An online content host who or that receives a take-down notice must remove, or prevent access by the public to, all copies of the online publication that is the subject of the notice to or over which it has access or control as soon as is reasonably practicable after receipt of the notice but no later than the end of the required period.
If a take-down notice requires an online content host to preserve a copy of the relevant online publication for the purposes of an investigation or proceedings, they must preserve a copy, hold it securely, and provide it to an Inspector on request.
An online content host may also preserve a copy of the online publication if they intend to lodge or have lodged—
a submission under section 13(1)(ba) for a classification decision for the relevant online publication:
an application for a review under Part 4 against the classification decision for the relevant online publication:
a notice of appeal related to that application for review.
If subsection (3) applies, the online content host may preserve a copy of the online publication for as long as it is needed to complete the relevant process but must hold it securely.
A take-down notice continues to have effect, even if the publication that is the subject of the notice is received by the Classification Office under section 13 for a classification decision,—
until the classification decision is made; and
until, if the publication is classified as objectionable, the completion of any review and related appeal.
If an online publication is confirmed as objectionable after the processes listed in subsection (5) have been completed or are no longer available, the relevant take-down notice then has permanent effect.
The following people are immune from civil and criminal liability for actions done in good faith when carrying out or intending to carry out their official duties relating to take-down notices:
An online content host is immune from criminal or civil liability—
if they remove or prevent access by the public to an online publication that is the subject of a take-down notice:
if they preserve a copy of an online publication for any of the reasons listed in section 119E(3) and hold it securely.
An Inspector may take enforcement proceedings in the District Court if an online content host fails or refuses to comply with a take-down notice within the required period.
In proceedings under this section, the court—
must not examine or make a determination about the issuing or merits of a take-down notice:
may determine whether the online content host had a reasonable justification for failing or refusing to comply with the notice within the required period or for any further delay after that period:
may permit the Inspector, by order of the court, to obtain discovery and administer interrogatories:
may order a remedy or costs under section 119I.
In proceedings under section 119H, the court may—
order that the online content host comply with the take-down notice by a date specified in the order:
order the online content host to pay a pecuniary penalty to the Crown:
award costs as the court thinks fit:
order interest to be paid in accordance with the court’s rules.
A pecuniary penalty is payable in an amount that the court determines is appropriate, taking into account all relevant matters, and, in particular,—
the nature and extent of the failure or refusal to comply with the notice; and
the circumstances in which the failure or refusal to comply occurred (including whether this was intentional, inadvertent, or caused by negligence).
The standard of proof for the matters in subsection (2) is the balance of probabilities.
The amount of a pecuniary penalty must not exceed $200,000.
Only 1 pecuniary penalty is payable in relation to the same take-down notice.
A take-down notice may be reviewed under this Act only as part of a review under Part 4 of the classification decision relating to the relevant online publication.
See section 13(1)(ba), which allows an online content host to submit an online publication to the Classification Office for a classification decision.
See also section 119E(5) for the effect of a take-down notice pending a classification decision being made and the completion of a review and any related appeal.
The Secretary must—
make publicly available a list of all take-down notices issued that have been complied with; and
publish the number of take-down notices issued and the number that were complied with each year in the annual report of the Department of Internal Affairs relating to that year.
The Secretary must, in the list referred to in subsection (1)(a), in each case, include the reasons for issuing the take-down notice.
In section 131(2B), replace “paragraph (d)” with “paragraph (d) or (e)”.
“paragraph (d)”
“paragraph (d) or (e)”
After section 132B, insert:
A person commits an offence if—
they livestream content knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that it is objectionable; or
they share content, or information about how to access content, as it is being livestreamed—
knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that the content is objectionable; and
with the intent of promoting or encouraging criminal acts or acts of terrorism.
A person who commits an offence under subsection (1) is liable on conviction,—
in the case of an individual, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years:
in the case of a body corporate, to a fine not exceeding $200,000.
A person does not commit an offence under this section by reason only that they are—
the service provider who or that provided access to the Internet or other electronic medium on which the content was livestreamed to the person who livestreamed the content; or
the online content host who or that has control over the part of the electronic retrieval system, such as an Internet site or an online application or similar, on which the content was livestreamed.
livestream has the meaning given in section 119A
objectionable has the meaning given in section 3 (as if the livestreamed content were a publication)
Compare: 1993 No 94 s 124
After section 149(a), insert:
prescribing information to be included in a take-down notice under section 119D:
26 May 2020
Introduction (Bill 268–1)
11 February 2021
First reading and referral to Governance and Administration Committee
13 September 2021
Reported from Governance and Administration Committee (Bill 268–2)
19 October 2021
Second reading
26 October 2021
Committee of the whole House