General policy statement
The intent of the COVID-19 Recovery (Fast-Track Consenting) Bill is to urgently promote employment growth to support New Zealand’s recovery from the economic and social impacts of COVID-19 and to support the certainty of ongoing investment across New Zealand while continuing to promote the sustainable management of natural and physical resources.
The Bill seeks to achieve this by establishing new fast-track resource consenting and designation processes for infrastructure and development projects. This Bill also enables specific work on existing infrastructure to occur without the need for a resource consent.
The Bill, with the aim of supporting employment and boosting local economies, will accelerate nationwide projects and activities already planned by central and local government, as well as the private sector. The Bill also seeks to address New Zealand’s infrastructure deficit, improve long-term productivity, and encourage projects that will promote New Zealanders’ future wellbeing and resilience. This includes supporting the transition to a low-emissions economy and improving resilience to climate change and natural hazards while supporting sustainable management. Persons exercising functions and powers under this Bill must act in a manner that is consistent with the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi and with Treaty settlements.
The Bill will enable 2 categories of projects to have access to the fast-track consenting and designation processes, as follows:
listed projects: Schedule 2 of the Bill lists specific Government-led projects for which applications for resource consents (consent applications) or notices of requirement for designations (notices of requirement) can be submitted to the EPA to be assessed for completeness before being referred to a panel for consideration:
referred projects: any persons with a project can apply to the Minister for the Environment (the Minister) to fast-track their consent or designation. If approved, the Minister will recommend an Order in Council to the Governor-General to confirm that the eligible project may be referred to a panel. The Minister of Conservation will jointly make the referral decision with the Minister if any part of the project would occur in the coastal marine area.
Projects may be in the form of a single large project or comprise smaller and related projects, and they may cross local authority boundaries. A panel will consider and determine resource consents and designations for listed and referred projects and replace the role of local authorities as consenting authorities under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). A panel will also make the decision on notices of requirement for designations. Appropriate environmental safeguards, as provided for under the RMA, will apply to this process. A panel must apply the purpose of the Bill alongside Part 2 of the RMA.
In addition, the Bill enables certain agencies to carry out specific works on existing infrastructure without the need for a resource consent. The works are limited to the operation, replacement, and maintenance of, and minor upgrades to, certain existing infrastructure located within the road and rail corridor and on land owned by the agencies. The specific works detailed in the Bill can be undertaken by the New Zealand Transport Agency and KiwiRail Holdings Limited. The Bill also enables local authorities, Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities, and the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development (MHUD) to be added for specific activities and works after the Bill is enacted, through an Order in Council recommended to the Governor-General by the Minister.
The Bill is a short-term intervention to stimulate the economy and therefore the new Act will self-repeal 2 years from enactment. The Minister will still be able to recommend an Order in Council to the Governor-General to confirm eligible projects up until the 2-year deadline. Orders in Council made under this legislation (before the self-repeal date) will continue to have effect, as required, to ensure that consents and designations for these projects can be determined (and cost-recovered) beyond the self-repeal date.
Projects listed in the Bill
Schedule 2 of the Bill lists projects (listed projects) for which consent applications or notices of requirement can be submitted to the EPA to be assessed for completeness before being referred to a panel for consideration. All of these projects are led by government agencies and Crown entities and have been assessed as delivering public benefit.
When considering these projects, a panel’s function is largely limited to imposing conditions on the consent and designations. For applications for resource consents and designations required for listed projects, the panel may only decline a listed project if the resource consent or designation would not be consistent with a national policy statement, including the New Zealand coastal policy statement, or would not be consistent with the terms of a relevant Treaty settlement.
Referred projects confirmed through Orders in Council
Any person or organisation will be able to apply to the Minister to use the fast-track consenting process. When considering whether the project would help to achieve the purpose of the Bill, the Minister may consider any or all of the following matters:
economic benefits for communities or industries affected by COVID-19:
the social and cultural wellbeing of current and future generations:
whether the project would likely progress faster by using this process:
whether there is potential for the project to have significant adverse environmental effects:
whether the project may result in a public benefit by, for example,—
increasing housing supply:
contributing to well-functioning urban environments:
providing infrastructure in order to improve economic, employment, and environmental outcomes, and increase productivity:
improving environmental outcomes for coastal or freshwater quality, air quality, or indigenous biodiversity:
contributing to New Zealand’s efforts to mitigate climate change and transition more quickly to a low-emissions economy (in terms of reducing New Zealand’s net emissions of greenhouse gases):
promoting the protection of historic heritage:
strengthening environmental, economic, and social resilience, in terms of managing the risks from natural hazards and the effects of climate change.
A project is not eligible to be referred to a panel—
if it involves an activity that is described as a prohibited activity in relevant plan or national environmental standard;
if it would occur on land returned under a Treaty settlement or within a customary marine title area; or
if it would have more than a minor adverse effect on the exercise of a protected customary right, without the prior written approval of the relevant landowners (with respect to Treaty settlements) or holders of relevant customary marine title orders or protected customary rights recognition orders recognised under the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011.
If the Minister is satisfied that the application is eligible and will help to achieve the purpose of the Bill, and the Minister decides to not decline the application, the Minister will undertake targeted consultation with relevant local authorities and appropriate ministerial colleagues. The Minister may also choose to invite written comments from others.
Before the Minister decides to refer a project to an expert consenting panel, the Minister must also obtain and consider a report by the Office for Māori Crown Relations—Te Arawhiti on Treaty settlement obligations and interests under the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011. This report will contain the following information:
the relevant iwi authorities and Treaty settlement entities in the project area:
the Treaty settlements (Acts and deeds) that relate to the project area:
the relevant principles and provisions in those Treaty settlements, including those that relate to the composition of a decision-making body for the purposes of the RMA:
any recognised negotiation mandates for, or current negotiations for, Treaty settlements that relate to the project area:
any court orders that recognise protected customary rights or customary marine title in relation to the project area.
The Minister will have discretion to reject an application for any reason at any point prior to the Order in Council being made.
The Ministry for the Environment will provide advice to support the Minister’s decision on whether to accept an application and refer a project to a panel through an Order in Council. The decision-making criteria that apply to resource consents and designations in the RMA will also apply to referred projects, except that panels must apply the purpose of the Bill alongside Part 2 of the RMA.
Expert consenting panel processes
The panels will be responsible for considering applications and determining resource consents and designations for listed and referred projects.
A panel convener who is a sitting or retired Environment Judge will convene the panels and appoint panel members and chairpersons of panels. The convener can choose to be a chairperson.
The panels will be chaired by a current or retired Environment Court Judge (or other judge, or a suitably qualified lawyer with resource management expertise) and must include a member of (or person nominated by) the relevant local authorities and include a member nominated by the relevant iwi authorities. Each panel must collectively have—
knowledge, skill, and expertise relating to resource management:
technical expertise relevant to the project:
expertise in tikanga Māori and mātauranga Māori.
The Environmental Protection Authority will assess consent applications and notices of requirement for completeness and provide secretariat support and other services to the panels.
The panels will determine the consent applications and notices of requirement and follow a fast-track resource consent (or notice of requirement) process, as follows:
information requirements are tailored for consent applications and notices of requirement:
instead of giving public notice or limited notice of consent applications or notices of requirement, a panel will invite comments on the application from persons specified in the legislation and the Orders in Council (if applicable) not later than 10 working days after the application is first lodged:
persons who have been invited to comment have 10 working days after the date on which the invitation was given to provide comments:
there is no requirement to hold a hearing:
in making its decision, a panel will be required to—
apply Part 2 of the RMA alongside the purpose of the new Act:
act consistently with the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi:
act consistently with any relevant Treaty settlements:
have regard to relevant plans, regional and national policy statements, and other documents, similarly to the way that a decision-maker would under the RMA:
a panel must issue its decision on the application within 25 working days of the date it specifies for receiving comments on the application:
a panel can double this 25–working-day time frame if the scale of the project that is the subject of the application means it cannot be determined within that time frame.
The overall processing time frame will be reduced, because a panel will have no additional ability to extend time frames (other than the additional 25 working days above), limited ability to suspend applications (see clause 6 of Schedule 6), and there are restricted appeal rights.
For projects including multiple activities, of any size, panels may issue decisions in stages to enable initial works to be started while further details or later stages of the project are worked through in subsequent approval processes.
Panels will also make decisions for notices of requirement lodged by requiring authorities to confirm designations. Under standard RMA processes, requiring authorities are the decision makers and the relevant local authority only make recommendations. It is not appropriate for a requiring authority to make the decision on a designation and conditions when the fast-track process is being used, given the lack of a merits appeal. Therefore, the panels will make the decision on a designation, which is similar to the decision-making framework for Boards of Inquiry considering proposals of national significance under the RMA.
The applicant or requiring authority for the listed and referred projects is responsible for the costs incurred by the expert consenting panel and the EPA in performing their duties and functions under this legislation.
Work on infrastructure
The Bill enables specific works for certain existing public infrastructure to be undertaken by certain agencies as of right, subject to performance standards that follow best-practice guidelines. This process is limited to the operation, replacement, and maintenance of, and minor upgrades to, existing public infrastructure located solely within the road and rail corridor and on land owned by certain agencies. This is to ensure that this provision relates to the maintenance and minor upgrading of existing infrastructure and not to new projects where infrastructure currently does not exist.
Currently the specific works and performance standards have been developed for the New Zealand Transport Agency and Kiwirail Holdings Limited. Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities, MHUD, and local authorities will be able to access this Bill when their specific works and performance standards are added through an Order in Council.
As a safeguard, this process is not available where the proposed activity is categorised as a discretionary, non-complying, or prohibited activity in the relevant council plan. The works will not be able to be undertaken in sites of cultural or historical significance, within outstanding water bodies or wāhi tapu sites, or if the work requires a permanent water take that would require a resource consent under the relevant plan or proposed plan. The works must also comply with performance standards that follow best-practice guidance and site management.
The agencies must partner with iwi and hapū groups and Treaty settlement entities that have interests in the area of the proposed work, to identify sites of cultural significance and how to manage them adequately. They must also provide a notice of intention to the relevant local authorities and iwi, hapū, and Treaty settlement entities before work is undertaken, detailing the extent of works, any protocols or management plans needed, and how monitoring will occur.
Local authorities will be responsible for compliance, monitoring, and enforcement to ensure that agencies meet the performance standards and will take appropriate action if necessary. The Bill will provide for local authorities to recover costs and for iwi and hapū to recover costs incurred in relation to identifying wāhi tapu and other sites of cultural significance. This Bill will authorise regional council activities for a duration of 15 years, to avoid the need to immediately reconsent ongoing activities that would otherwise require a resource consent (such as discharges) once the Act is repealed.
Treaty of Waitangi
The Bill includes an overarching Treaty of Waitangi clause, stating that the Minister and all persons exercising functions and powers under the Bill must act in a manner that is consistent with the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi and with Treaty settlements.
As outlined earlier, the Office for Māori Crown Relations—Te Arawhiti will be required to provide a report to the Minister that includes information on the relevant iwi authority, any Treaty settlement entities in the project area, any Treaty settlements in the project area, and interests under the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011.
This report will assist the Minister to comply with clause 6 of the Bill, which requires the Minister to act in a manner consistent with the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi and Treaty settlement legislation when making a determination as to whether a project should be referred to a panel. This report will also be provided to a panel if the project is referred for consideration. It will be the responsibility of a panel to ensure any consents granted and any designations confirmed, including any conditions, are consistent with the principles of the Treaty and any Treaty settlements.
Public participation and appeal rights
To support the intent of the fast-track process to accelerate consenting and recovery from the economic and social impacts of COVID-19, the Bill provides the Government with a range of powers to by-pass usual consenting process steps, including public consultation, hearing processes, and appeals to the Environment Court.
As described in the section on the panel process, the Bill does not require public or limited notification of an application. Instead the panel will be required to invite comments on the application from persons specified in the Order in Council and the persons expressly listed in Schedule 6. The Bill provides reduced time frames compared to standard RMA processes for the nominated persons to provide their comments. The consent process does not include a requirement to hold a hearing. If a panel does hold a hearing, it may grant leave to allow cross-examination.
Appeals against a panel decision on a consent application (or notice of requirement to confirm a designation) are limited to a point of law appeal to the High Court and a further right of appeal to the Court of Appeal. There will be no further right of appeal beyond the Court of Appeal. Any application for judicial review will need to be filed at the same time as a point of law appeal to the High Court.
The following persons will be able to lodge an appeal:
the consent applicant or requiring authority, as the case requires:
any relevant local authority:
any person who provided comments in response to an invitation by the panel:
any person who has an interest in the decision appealed against that is greater than that of the general public.