If this regulation is being applied for the purpose of subpart 2, an enterprise cannot meet the ownership and control test in relation to a transaction if, in relation to the transaction, the enterprise—
(a)
is an agent, a trustee, or a representative of an overseas person who is not an Australian investor; or
(b)
acts in any way on behalf of an overseas person who is not an Australian investor; or
(c)
is subject to the direction, control, or influence of an overseas person who is not an Australian investor.
Example
A company is constituted under Australian law. It does not have substantive business operations in Australia so, in order to be an Australian investor under regulation 78, it must meet the ownership and control test.
It is entering into a transaction to acquire the freehold estate in residential (but not otherwise sensitive) land.
Only New Zealand individuals and Australian individuals are shareholders of the company, and they have all the beneficial entitlement to and interest in the company’s securities, the power to control the composition of all of the company’s governing body, and the right to exercise all of the voting power at a meeting of the company.
However, in relation to the transaction, the company is acquiring the land as trustee for a overseas person who is not an Australian investor. The ownership and control test is not met in relation to the transaction and the company cannot rely on the exemption in regulation 75.
In addition, the beneficiary would also be a relevant investor under paragraph (b) of the definition of relevant investor in regulation 71, and is an overseas person who is not an Australian investor. That is another reason why the exemption in regulation 75 could not be relied upon.