Dated at Wellington this 29th day of October 2021.
Liam Mason,
General Counsel,
Financial Markets Authority.
Statement of reasons
This notice comes into force on 18 November 2021 and is revoked on 17 November 2026. The notice applies to managed investment schemes that meet the following 2 criteria:
the principal investment policy and objectives of the scheme are to invest (directly or indirectly), in the ordinary course of business, in real property and other assets in order to establish or manage a forest with the intention of earning a return on the investment through harvesting the trees, selling forestry rights, or selling land used for forestry activity; and
the scheme is not a managed fund.
The main effects of this notice are that—
exemptions from governing document and licensing requirements will apply for managers of existing forestry schemes that are closed to new investment (provided the manager has less than $40 million of assets under management in respect of registered forestry schemes):
existing forestry schemes that are closed to new investment are not required to have real property assets or carbon credits held by the scheme’s supervisor, or other independent person, provided that those assets are subject to a registered security interest in favour of the supervisor:
custodians of forestry schemes are not required to reconcile scheme cash records daily, provided those records are reconciled with a frequency suited to the level of transactions for the scheme:
where a custodian holds scheme property, the custodian does not need to have an annual assurance engagement with a qualified auditor of their processes, procedures, and controls, provided they obtain an assurance engagement when the supervisor considers that this is desirable to provide reasonable assurance in relation to custody of the scheme property:
managers of forestry schemes are not required to make a quarterly report on limit breaks for periods when minimal work is being done in the forest if no limit break occurs in that quarter:
corporate general partners of some schemes that are limited partnerships are exempt from disclosure, governance, and financial reporting requirements in relation to shares in the general partner held by or offered to scheme participants.
The Financial Markets Authority (the FMA), after satisfying itself as to the matters set out in section 557 of the FMC Act, considers it appropriate to grant the exemptions because,—
in general, the exemptions will reduce ongoing compliance costs for forestry schemes in relation to their custody and other governance arrangements by relieving them of certain obligations that are not required, in view of the particular characteristics of these schemes, to ensure that appropriate governance arrangements are in place to allow for effective monitoring and reduce governance risks:
in relation to the exemptions from governing document and licensing requirements,—
the costs of having compliant governing documents are unnecessary when existing forestry schemes have deeds of participation that are broadly comparable to requirements under the FMC Act and where schemes are closed to new investors and have a finite life:
the costs of licensing are not commensurate with the benefits for existing closed schemes in circumstances where there is a low level of manager activity and the manager has a limited amount of assets under management:
in relation to the exemptions from independent custody requirements,—
real property is generally purchased and held for a considerable time by forestry schemes and real property can be transferred, or other dealings made against the property, only through registration of an instrument under the Land Transfer Act 2017. In view of this, requirements for independent custody of real property may not be needed to ensure effective monitoring and to reduce governance risks, provided that the real property is held on trust and there is a registered encumbrance over the property in favour of the supervisor to protect scheme participants’ interests. Consequential relief is appropriate, on the same basis, for a scheme’s carbon credits where the credits must be held by the owner of the scheme’s real property under applicable legislation:
relief from independent custody for real property and carbon credits will allow existing forestry schemes to retain their current custody arrangements for these assets and address concerns from supervisors about possible liability that may arise if they are the registered owner of a scheme’s land and standing trees:
in relation to the exemption from the daily cash reconciliation requirement, forestry schemes typically have a low volume and frequency of transactions, and daily reconciliations of records of money for the scheme by the custodian are unlikely to be required to ensure the records accurately state the scheme’s money and all transactions relating to that money. Adequate protection will be provided for scheme participants if those records are reconciled with a frequency suited to the level of transactions for the scheme:
in relation to the exemption from the annual assurance engagement requirement, a custodian’s processes, procedures, and controls are likely to be less complex for a forestry scheme in view of its investments, and risks in relation to custody of the scheme’s assets are likely to be reduced. In those circumstances, and where the annual audit of the scheme’s financial statements provides regular independent verification in relation to the scheme property, an annual assurance engagement may not be required. Adequate protection will be provided for scheme participants in relation to custody of the scheme’s assets if an assurance engagement is obtained when the supervisor determines that circumstances have resulted in increased risks for custody of scheme property and therefore the value to investors of an assurance engagement outweighs costs. Supervisors are well placed to decide when an assurance engagement is needed, given their independence, licensed status, and statutory duties to act in the best interests of scheme participants and to carry out their functions and duties to a professional standard of care:
in relation to the exemption from the quarterly limit break reporting requirement, the low volume and frequency of activity in the period from when planting, pruning, and thinning work is completed and before harvest begins means it is unlikely limit breaks will occur in this period. In periods where there are no limit breaks, routine quarterly limit break reports are of no value:
in relation to the corporate general partner disclosure and reporting requirements exemptions, some forestry schemes that are limited partnerships are structured so that scheme participants hold all the shares in the corporate general partner. Where scheme participants will receive the benefit of disclosure and financial reporting in relation to their investment in managed investment products in the scheme, they are unlikely to gain any benefit from also receiving disclosure and financial reporting in relation to the shares in the general partner, provided information about those shares is included in the disclosures for the scheme and the corporate general partner is not carrying on any independent activity.
Therefore, the FMA is satisfied that—
granting the exemptions is necessary or desirable in order to promote the purposes of the FMC Act. Specifically, the exemptions will—
promote the confident and informed participation of businesses, investors, and consumers in the financial markets; and
avoid unnecessary compliance costs; and
promote innovation and flexibility in the financial markets; and
ensure that appropriate governance arrangements apply to financial products that allow for effective monitoring and reduce governance risks; and
the exemptions are not broader than is reasonably necessary to address the matters that gave rise to the exemptions because—
the exemptions are restricted to forestry schemes, which have special characteristics due to the nature of their investments; and
the exemptions from governing document and licensing requirements apply only to existing forestry schemes that are closed to new investment where the manager is not large (ie, does not have more than $40 million total forestry scheme assets under management) and there is a low level of manager activity; and
the exemptions from independent custody apply only to custody of real property and carbon credits for existing forestry schemes that are closed to new investment where there is a registered security interest over that property in favour of the supervisor; and
alternative requirements apply for custodians relying on the exemptions from daily cash reconciliations and annual assurance engagements; and
the quarterly limit break reporting exemption is limited to periods of low activity and the manager will still report on limit breaks that do occur in this period; and
the corporate general partner disclosure and financial reporting exemptions apply only to schemes that are limited partnerships where scheme participants hold all the shares in the general partner and sufficient information will be provided to scheme participants through disclosure and financial reporting for managed investment products in the scheme.
Issued under the authority of the Legislation Act 2019.
Date of notification in Gazette: 4 November 2021.
This notice is administered by the Financial Markets Authority.