High Court Fees Amendment Regulations 2009
High Court Fees Amendment Regulations 2009
Checking for alerts... Loading...
High Court Fees Amendment Regulations 2009
Reprint
as at 1 July 2013

High Court Fees Amendment Regulations 2009
(SR 2009/321)
Anand Satyanand, Governor-General
Order in Council
At Wellington this 19th day of October 2009
Present:
His Excellency the Governor-General in Council
High Court Fees Amendment Regulations 2009: revoked, on 1 July 2013, pursuant to regulation 28(c) of the High Court Fees Regulations 2013 (SR 2013/226).
Note
Changes authorised by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 have been made in this reprint.
A general outline of these changes is set out in the notes at the end of this reprint, together with other explanatory material about this reprint.
These regulations are administered by the Ministry of Justice.
Pursuant to section 100A of the Judicature Act 1908, His Excellency the Governor-General, acting on the advice and with the consent of the Executive Council, makes the following regulations.
Regulations
1 Title
These regulations are the High Court Fees Amendment Regulations 2009.
2 Commencement
These regulations come into force on 20 November 2009.
3 Principal regulations amended
These regulations amend the High Court Fees Regulations 2001.
4 Interpretation
-
(1) The definition of appeal in regulation 3 is amended by omitting
“Part 10 or Part 17”
and substituting“Part 20 or 26”
.(2) Regulation 3 is amended by revoking the definition of concession rate proceeding and substituting the following definition:
“concession rate proceeding means any of the following proceedings:
“(a) an appeal to the Court under any enactment; or
“(b) an application for review under Part 1 of the Judicature Amendment Act 1972; or
“(c) a proceeding to which Part 18 of the High Court Rules applies; or
“(d) an originating application to which Part 19 of the High Court Rules applies; or
“(e) an application to which Part 30 of the High Court Rules applies; or
“(f) an application to put a company into liquidation to which Part 31 of the High Court Rules applies”.
(3) The definition of setting down date in regulation 3 is amended by omitting
“rule 434(3) or (5)”
and substituting“rule 7.13”
.(4) The definition of standard track in regulation 3 is amended by omitting
“rule 426”
and substituting“rule 7.1”
.(5) The definition of working day in regulation 3 is amended by omitting
“rule 3(1)”
and substituting“rule 1.3(1)”
.
5 Schedule amended
-
[Revoked]
Regulation 5: revoked, on 1 July 2011, by regulation 5(c) of the High Court Fees Amendment Regulations 2011 (SR 2011/163).
Schedule
|
Schedule: revoked, on 1 July 2011, by regulation 5(c) of the High Court Fees Amendment Regulations 2011 (SR 2011/163).
Rebecca Kitteridge,
Clerk of the Executive Council.
Issued under the authority of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989.
Date of notification in Gazette: 22 October 2009.
Contents
1General
2Status of reprints
3How reprints are prepared
4Changes made under section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989
5List of amendments incorporated in this reprint (most recent first)
Notes
1 General
-
This is a reprint of the High Court Fees Amendment Regulations 2009. The reprint incorporates all the amendments to the regulations as at 1 July 2013, as specified in the list of amendments at the end of these notes.
Relevant provisions of any amending enactments that contain transitional, savings, or application provisions that cannot be compiled in the reprint are also included, after the principal enactment, in chronological order. For more information, see http://www.pco.parliament.govt.nz/reprints/
.
2 Status of reprints
-
Under section 16D of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989, reprints are presumed to correctly state, as at the date of the reprint, the law enacted by the principal enactment and by the amendments to that enactment. This presumption applies even though editorial changes authorised by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 have been made in the reprint.
This presumption may be rebutted by producing the official volumes of statutes or statutory regulations in which the principal enactment and its amendments are contained.
3 How reprints are prepared
A number of editorial conventions are followed in the preparation of reprints. For example, the enacting words are not included in Acts, and provisions that are repealed or revoked are omitted. For a detailed list of the editorial conventions, see http://www.pco.parliament.govt.nz/editorial-conventions/
or Part 8 of the Tables of New Zealand Acts and Ordinances and Statutory Regulations and Deemed Regulations in Force.
4 Changes made under section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989
-
Section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 authorises the making of editorial changes in a reprint as set out in sections 17D and 17E of that Act so that, to the extent permitted, the format and style of the reprinted enactment is consistent with current legislative drafting practice. Changes that would alter the effect of the legislation are not permitted.
A new format of legislation was introduced on 1 January 2000. Changes to legislative drafting style have also been made since 1997, and are ongoing. To the extent permitted by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989, all legislation reprinted after 1 January 2000 is in the new format for legislation and reflects current drafting practice at the time of the reprint.
In outline, the editorial changes made in reprints under the authority of section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 are set out below, and they have been applied, where relevant, in the preparation of this reprint:
•omission of unnecessary referential words (such as
“of this section”
and“of this Act”
)•typeface and type size (Times Roman, generally in 11.5 point)
-
•layout of provisions, including:
•indentation
•position of section headings (eg, the number and heading now appear above the section)
•format of definitions (eg, the defined term now appears in bold type, without quotation marks)
•format of dates (eg, a date formerly expressed as
“the 1st day of January 1999”
is now expressed as“1 January 1999”
)•position of the date of assent (it now appears on the front page of each Act)
•punctuation (eg, colons are not used after definitions)
•Parts numbered with roman numerals are replaced with arabic numerals, and all cross-references are changed accordingly
-
•case and appearance of letters and words, including:
•format of headings (eg, headings where each word formerly appeared with an initial capital letter followed by small capital letters are amended so that the heading appears in bold, with only the first word (and any proper nouns) appearing with an initial capital letter)
•small capital letters in section and subsection references are now capital letters
•schedules are renumbered (eg, Schedule 1 replaces First Schedule), and all cross-references are changed accordingly
•running heads (the information that appears at the top of each page)
•format of two-column schedules of consequential amendments, and schedules of repeals (eg, they are rearranged into alphabetical order, rather than chronological).
5 List of amendments incorporated in this reprint (most recent first)
-
High Court Fees Regulations 2013 (SR 2013/226): regulation 28(c)
High Court Fees Amendment Regulations 2011 (SR 2011/163): regulation 5(c)
"Related Legislation
"Related Legislation
"Related Legislation
Versions
High Court Fees Amendment Regulations 2009
RSS feed link copied, you can now paste this link into your feed reader.