Health Practitioners (Quality Assurance Activity: MidCentral Health) Notice 2005
Checking for alerts... Loading...
Reprint
as at 12 April 2013
Health Practitioners (Quality Assurance Activity: MidCentral Health) Notice 2005
(SR 2005/283)
Health Practitioners (Quality Assurance Activity: MidCentral Health) Notice 2005: revoked, on 12 April 2013 (after expiring on 10 October 2010), by clause 4 of the Health Practitioners (Quality Assurance Activity—MidCentral DHB) Notice 2013 (SR 2013/102).
Note
Changes authorised by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 have been made in this reprint.
A general outline of these changes is set out in the notes at the end of this reprint, together with other explanatory material about this reprint.
This notice is administered by the Ministry of Health.
Pursuant to section 54 of the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003, the Minister of Health gives the following notice.
Contents
Notice
1 Title
This notice is the Health Practitioners (Quality Assurance Activity: MidCentral Health) Notice 2005.
2 Commencement
This notice comes into force on the day after the date of its notification in the Gazette.
3 Declaration of protected quality assurance activity
The MidCentral Health Quality Assurance Activity described in the Schedule is a protected quality assurance activity.
4 Revocation
The Health Practitioners (Quality Assurance Activity: MidCentral District Health Board) Notice 2004 (SR 2004/456) is revoked.
Schedule |
1 Objective
The objective of the activity is to improve the practices and competence of health practitioners engaged in the activity by assessing the health services performed by those health practitioners.
2 Method
-
(1) The activity is based on information derived from health practitioners who provide health services on behalf of MidCentral Health.
(2) The activity involves—
(a) the examination of patients’ records; and
-
(b) the analysis of the following data on patients:
(i) admission and discharge; and
(ii) morbidity; and
(iii) mortality; and
(iv) outcomes of treatment; and
(c) the identification and analysis of any process or practice that results in an outcome for patients which may, but need not, be an adverse outcome; and
(d) the holding of peer review meetings; and
(e) the comparison of any data arising from the activities referred to in paragraphs (a) to (d) with national and international standards relating to data of that kind; and
(f) the undertaking of multi-disciplinary case reviews; and
-
(g) the review of—
(i) patient management; and
(ii) treatment decisions; and
(iii) internal auditing procedures; and
-
(h) the making of recommendations on how the health practitioners who are engaging in the activity can improve their performance so as to—
(i) improve the quality of care they provide; and
(ii) reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes; and
(i) the facilitation and monitoring of the implementation of any such recommendations.
Dated at Wellington this 10th day of October 2005.
Hon Annette King,
Minister of Health.
Date of notification in Gazette: 20 October 2005.
Contents
1General
2Status of reprints
3How reprints are prepared
4Changes made under section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989
5List of amendments incorporated in this reprint (most recent first)
Notes
1 General
-
This is a reprint of the Health Practitioners (Quality Assurance Activity: MidCentral Health) Notice 2005. The reprint incorporates all the amendments to the notice as at 12 April 2013, as specified in the list of amendments at the end of these notes.
Relevant provisions of any amending enactments that contain transitional, savings, or application provisions that cannot be compiled in the reprint are also included, after the principal enactment, in chronological order. For more information, see http://www.pco.parliament.govt.nz/reprints/
.
2 Status of reprints
-
Under section 16D of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989, reprints are presumed to correctly state, as at the date of the reprint, the law enacted by the principal enactment and by the amendments to that enactment. This presumption applies even though editorial changes authorised by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 have been made in the reprint.
This presumption may be rebutted by producing the official volumes of statutes or statutory regulations in which the principal enactment and its amendments are contained.
3 How reprints are prepared
A number of editorial conventions are followed in the preparation of reprints. For example, the enacting words are not included in Acts, and provisions that are repealed or revoked are omitted. For a detailed list of the editorial conventions, see http://www.pco.parliament.govt.nz/editorial-conventions/
or Part 8 of the Tables of New Zealand Acts and Ordinances and Statutory Regulations and Deemed Regulations in Force.
4 Changes made under section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989
-
Section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 authorises the making of editorial changes in a reprint as set out in sections 17D and 17E of that Act so that, to the extent permitted, the format and style of the reprinted enactment is consistent with current legislative drafting practice. Changes that would alter the effect of the legislation are not permitted.
A new format of legislation was introduced on 1 January 2000. Changes to legislative drafting style have also been made since 1997, and are ongoing. To the extent permitted by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989, all legislation reprinted after 1 January 2000 is in the new format for legislation and reflects current drafting practice at the time of the reprint.
In outline, the editorial changes made in reprints under the authority of section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 are set out below, and they have been applied, where relevant, in the preparation of this reprint:
•omission of unnecessary referential words (such as
“of this section”
and“of this Act”
)•typeface and type size (Times Roman, generally in 11.5 point)
-
•layout of provisions, including:
•indentation
•position of section headings (eg, the number and heading now appear above the section)
•format of definitions (eg, the defined term now appears in bold type, without quotation marks)
•format of dates (eg, a date formerly expressed as
“the 1st day of January 1999”
is now expressed as“1 January 1999”
)•position of the date of assent (it now appears on the front page of each Act)
•punctuation (eg, colons are not used after definitions)
•Parts numbered with roman numerals are replaced with arabic numerals, and all cross-references are changed accordingly
-
•case and appearance of letters and words, including:
•format of headings (eg, headings where each word formerly appeared with an initial capital letter followed by small capital letters are amended so that the heading appears in bold, with only the first word (and any proper nouns) appearing with an initial capital letter)
•small capital letters in section and subsection references are now capital letters
•schedules are renumbered (eg, Schedule 1 replaces First Schedule), and all cross-references are changed accordingly
•running heads (the information that appears at the top of each page)
•format of two-column schedules of consequential amendments, and schedules of repeals (eg, they are rearranged into alphabetical order, rather than chronological).
5 List of amendments incorporated in this reprint (most recent first)
-
Health Practitioners (Quality Assurance Activity—MidCentral DHB) Notice 2013 (SR 2013/102): clause 4
Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 (2003 No 48): section 54(4)
Versions
Health Practitioners (Quality Assurance Activity: MidCentral Health) Notice 2005
RSS feed link copied, you can now paste this link into your feed reader.